DrugSense FOCUS Alert #241 Wed, 1 May 2002 Drug Czar Ignores IOM Report, Record of Failure Write Away! Write Now! It's your Right to Write! Just DO It! PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE Taking a break from blaming drug users for September 11th, Drug Czar John Walters has published yet another misleading op-ed. This time the subject is marijuana and the Washington Post is the messenger. Walters pretends to be rational and even goes so far as to acknowledge the existence of prohibition-related violence. Unfortunately, in Walters' mind gangland killings are acceptable collateral damage providing the price of marijuana remains high. The near-record levels of drug use cited by Walters suggest that the price of pot has not kept kids from smoking it. Walters' most glaring offense is his lies about medical marijuana. In claiming a lack of available research on a plant that has been used medicinally for thousands of years, Walters' ignores the recommendations of the 1999 Institute of Medicine Report, commissioned by the very same White House Office of National Drug Policy he works for. Potential LTE talking points: * There is no evidence that marijuana use would "soar" if legal. If anything tough drug laws increase use. A majority of European Union countries have decriminalized pot. Despite marijuana prohibition, lifetime use of marijuana in the U.S. is higher than any European country. See: http://www.monitoringthefuture.org/pubs/espad_pr.pdf * The anti-tobacco campaign Walters mentions succeeded at reducing tobacco use without relying on a punitive criminal-justice system. If social marketing works for addictive tobacco, why is the threat of criminal records necessary to deter marijuana use? * Drug policy dictated by federal bureaucrats with "drug-free" backgrounds gives rise to policy based on ignorance. Key stakeholders (actual drug users) are not only ignored, but persecuted and incarcerated. * The increased marijuana potency cited by Walters, if true, is not necessarily a bad thing. Potent pot requires less smoke inhalation and incurs fewer health risks to the user. * The ONDCP needs to stop pretending there is no scientific basis for medical marijuana and read the recommendations of its own report. See: http://www.mpp.org/science.html Thanks for your effort and support. WRITE A LETTER TODAY It's not what others do it's what YOU do PLEASE SEND US A COPY OF YOUR LETTER OR TELL US WHAT YOU DID (Letter, Phone, fax etc.) Please post a copy your letter or report your action to the sent letter list () if you are subscribed, or by E-mailing a copy directly to if you are not subscribed. Your letter will then be forwarded to the list with so others can learn from your efforts and be motivated to follow suit. Subscribing to the Sent LTE list () will help you to review other sent LTEs and perhaps come up with new ideas or approaches as well as keeping others aware of your important writing efforts. To subscribe to the Sent LTE mailing list see http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm and/or http://www.mapinc.org/lists/index.htm#form This is VERY IMPORTANT as it is one very effective way of gauging our impact and effectiveness. CONTACT INFO ARTICLE URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v02/n832/a02.html Webpage: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A11915-2002Apr30.html Pubdate: Wed, 01 May 2002 Source: Washington Post (DC) Page: A25 Copyright: 2002 The Washington Post Company Contact: Website: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/491 Author: John P. Walters Note: The writer is director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy. THE MYTH OF 'HARMLESS' MARIJUANA Last December the University of Michigan released its annual survey "Monitoring the Future," which measures drug use among American youth. Very little had changed from the previous year's report; most indicators were flat. The report generated little in the way of public comment. Yet what it brought to light was deeply disturbing. Drug use among our nation's teens remains stable, but at near-record levels, with some 49 percent of high school seniors experimenting with marijuana at least once prior to graduation -- and 22 percent smoking marijuana at least once a month. After years of giggling at quaintly outdated marijuana scare stories like the 1936 movie "Reefer Madness," we've become almost conditioned to think that any warnings about the true dangers of marijuana are overblown. But marijuana is far from "harmless" -- it is pernicious. Parents are often unaware that today's marijuana is different from that of a generation ago, with potency levels 10 to 20 times stronger than the marijuana with which they were familiar. Marijuana directly affects the brain. Researchers have learned that it impairs the ability of young people to concentrate and retain information during their peak learning years, and when their brains are still developing. The THC in marijuana attaches itself to receptors in the hippocampal region of the brain, weakening short-term memory and interfering with the mechanisms that form long-term memory. Do our struggling schools really need another obstacle to student achievement? Marijuana smoking can hurt more than just grades. According to the Department of Health and Human Services, every year more than 2,500 admissions to the District of Columbia's overtaxed emergency rooms -- some 300 of them for patients under age 18 -- are linked to marijuana smoking, and the number of marijuana-related emergencies is growing. Each year, for example, marijuana use is linked to tens of thousands of serious traffic accidents. Research has now established that marijuana is in fact addictive. Of the 4.3 million Americans who meet the diagnostic criteria for needing drug treatment (criteria developed by the American Psychiatric Association, not police departments or prosecutors) two-thirds are dependent on marijuana, according to HHS. These are not occasional pot smokers but people with real problems directly traceable to their use of marijuana, including significant health problems, emotional problems and difficulty in cutting down on use. Sixty percent of teens in drug treatment have a primary marijuana diagnosis. Despite this and other strong scientific evidence of marijuana's destructive effects, a cynical campaign is underway, in the District and elsewhere, to proclaim the virtues of "medical" marijuana. By now most Americans realize that the push to "normalize" marijuana for medical use is part of the drug legalization agenda. Its chief funders, George Soros, John Sperling and Peter Lewis, have spent millions to help pay for referendums and ballot initiatives in states from Alaska to Maine. Now it appears that a medical marijuana campaign may be on the horizon for the District. Why? Is the American health care system -- the most sophisticated in the world -- really being hobbled by a lack of smoked medicines? The University of California's Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research is currently conducting scientific studies to determine the efficacy of marijuana in treating various ailments. Until that research is concluded, however, most of what the public hears from marijuana activists is little more than a compilation of anecdotes. Many questions remain unanswered, but the science is clear on a few things. Example: Marijuana contains hundreds of carcinogens. Moreover, anti-smoking efforts aimed at youth have been remarkably effective by building on a campaign to erode the social acceptability of tobacco. Should we undermine those efforts by promoting smoked marijuana as though it were a medicine? While medical marijuana initiatives are based on pseudo-science, their effects on the criminal justice system are anything but imaginary. By opening up legal loopholes, existing medical marijuana laws have caused police and prosecutors to stay away from marijuana prosecutions. Giving marijuana dealers a free pass is a terrible idea. In fact, thanks in part to excellent reporting in The Post, District residents are increasingly aware that marijuana dealers are dangerous criminals. The recent life-without-parole convictions of leaders of Washington's K Street Crew are only the latest evidence of this. As reported in The Post, the K Street Crew was a vicious group of marijuana dealers whose decade-long reign of terror was brought to an end only this year after a massive prosecution effort by Michael Volkov, chief gang prosecutor for the U.S. attorney's office. The K Street Crew is credited with at least 17 murders, including systematic killings of potential witnesses. (It should not be confused with the L Street Crew, a D.C. marijuana gang that killed eight people in the course of doing business.) Says prosecutor Volkov: "The experience in D.C. shows that marijuana dealers are no less violent than cocaine and heroin traffickers. They have just as much money to lose, just as much turf to lose, and just as many reasons to kill as any drug trafficker." Skeptics will charge that this kind of violence is just one more reason to legalize marijuana. A review of the nation's history with drug use suggests otherwise: When marijuana is inexpensive, as it would be if legal, use soars -- bad news for the District's schools, streets and emergency rooms. SAMPLE LETTER To the Editor: Drug czar John Walters is confused if he thinks that the principal argument for marijuana legalization is that the plant is relatively harmless. Like any drug, marijuana can be harmful if abused. It is not the effects of marijuana that necessitate drug law reform, but rather the effects of marijuana prohibition. Walters notes near-record levels of marijuana smoking among teenagers, yet fails to consider that drug dealers don't ID for age. Apparently Walters thinks leaving marijuana distribution in the hands of organized crime is a good thing providing pot remains expensive. Walters goes so far as to suggest the 17 murders committed by the K Street Crew, one of two "marijuana gangs" cited by Walters, are acceptable collateral damage. I for one do not approve of my tax dollars subsidizing organized crime and violence. The marijuana plant has never killed anyone. The same cannot be said of marijuana prohibition. Finally, we have the effects of drug laws on the individual. A heavy marijuana smoker will no doubt experience some negative consequences, but short-term memory problems are inconsequential compared to long-term criminal records. The government does not actively try and destroy the lives of alcoholics. I fail to see why marijuana smokers should be singled out for punishment. Robert Sharpe IMPORTANT: Always include your address and telephone number Please note: If you choose to use this letter as a model please modify it at least somewhat so that the paper does not receive numerous copies of the same letter and so that the original author receives credit for his/her work. TARGET ANALYSIS The Washington Post has over 1.5 million readers daily, 2.1 million readers on Sunday. While the Post has a nationwide audience, it most effectively reaches the people, and those who work for the federal government, inside the beltway. Reviewing previously published letters at http://www.mapinc.org/mapcgi/ltedex.pl?SOURCE=Washington+Post it is clear that the Post selects fairly short - three or four paragraph - letters to the editor to print. The body of the average printed letter is 146 words. The range of published letters is between 104 and 210 words in length. TWO MORE ALERT TARGETS The John P. Walters, U.S. Drug Czar's OPED "The Myth of 'Harmless' Marijuana" which was printed in the Washington Post also appeared in the following two newspapers Thursday, 2 May Source: St. Petersburg Times (FL) Contact: Source: Tampa Tribune (FL) Contact: ADDITIONAL INFO to help you in your letter writing efforts Writer's Resources http://www.mapinc.org/resource/ Prepared by Robert Sharpe, Focus Alert Specialist

Focus Alert Archive