Pubdate: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 Source: Register-Guard, The (OR) Copyright: 2000 The Register-Guard Contact: PO Box 10188, Eugene, OR 97440-2188 Website: http://www.registerguard.com/ HOSPITAL DRUG TESTS, ARRESTS SPARK HOT DEBATE BY JUSTICES WASHINGTON (AP) - Hearing a case in which women were arrested from their hospital beds, Supreme Court justices Wednesday vigorously debated whether hospitals can test pregnant women for drug use and turn the results over to police. ``This is being done for medical purposes,'' suggested Justice Antonin Scalia. ``The police didn't show up at the hospital and say, `We'd like to find a way to bust your patients.' '' But Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said she did not see how arresting women after they gave birth would protect the fetus, the primary concern of a South Carolina public hospital. ``I looked at the (hospital) consent form; it doesn't say anything about police,'' she said. Women treated at the Medical University of South Carolina contend that the hospital's former cocaine-testing policy violated pregnant patients' privacy and their constitutional protection against unreasonable searches. The women ``were searched by their doctors for evidence of crimes and then arrested, seven of them right out of their hospital beds,'' said Priscilla Smith, the lawyer for the women who sued. The hospital's attorney, Robert Hood, said the women were jailed ``not only for the illegal use of the drug but for what they were doing to their child. ... We are trying to stop a woman from doing irreparable, major harm to her child in utero.'' ``Law enforcement was not the purpose of this thing at all,'' Hood added. A federal appeals court upheld the tests as legitimate efforts to reduce cocaine use during pregnancy. The Supreme Court's ruling, expected by July, could determine whether the hospital reinstates the policy or whether other hospitals consider adopting similar tactics. Ten women who sued the Charleston hospital in 1993 said testing pregnant women for drugs and giving the results to police violated the Constitution's Fourth Amendment, which generally requires that searches be authorized by court warrant or based on reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed. The justices questioned both sides closely. Justice David H. Souter suggested to Smith that doctors might have ``a special need to know'' whether their patients are using drugs. But he also asked Hood whether doctors who reported positive test results had become agents of the police. Scalia compared the hospital's policy to a requirement in many states that doctors tell police when they encounter evidence of a crime, such as a gunshot wound. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor asked whether drug tests are routinely performed on pregnant women. ``Absolutely not, your honor,'' said Smith, who added that the testing policy was initiated by the hospital but jointly drawn up by police and hospital officials. There have been similar prosecutions in other states, but they occurred on a case-by-case basis and not through a hospital policy of turning drug tests over to police, said Janet Crepps of the Center for Reproductive Law and Policy, which is representing the 10 women. Most of those prosecutions were thrown out on grounds that state child-endangerment laws did not apply to fetuses, she said. The American Medical Association, in a friend-of-the-court brief, said the hospital's policy was more likely to increase harm to fetuses by discouraging women from seeking medical care or disclosing drug use to their doctors. The hospital began testing pregnant women for cocaine in 1989 and giving any positive results to police. Women found to be using illegal drugs were prosecuted under the state child-endangerment law. The hospital later dropped the policy, but by then police had arrested 30 maternity patients. A federal court jury upheld the testing policy, and the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed in July 1999. The appeals court said the urine tests were ``minimally intrusive'' and that hospital officials had a substantial interest in reducing cocaine use by pregnant women. - --- MAP posted-by: Don Beck