Pubdate: Tue, 30 May 2000 Source: Blue Springs Examiner (MO) Copyright: 2000 Blue Springs Examiner Contact: P.O. Box 1057, Blue Springs, MO 60413 Website: http://examiner.net/ BAD PROPOSAL NEEDS TO GO Tucked away in federal legislation aimed at the methamphetamine problem is truly dangerous proposal, one that needs to be stopped. Under the guise of giving formal approval to what is already taking place, officials propose changing the law to allow police to conduct searches without notice and seize property without immediately telling the owner. How, under any reasonable interpretation of Fourth Amendment guarantees against "unreasonable searches and seizures," can this stand up? If these are practices that are already going on, then those prosecutors and police officers ought to be up on charges, and the judges giving the OK ought to answer some hard questions. As it stands, if the police think you're running a meth lab, gambling parlor or something else illegal in your home, they go to a judge, show evidence and get a warrant to search the premises. Still, you have rights. One is to know that your property has been searched or is going to be searched. This bill would do away with that. So, for example, the cops could come into your business, copy your hard drive and leave, and you'd be none the wiser. Similarly, it has been well documented that police agencies are in love with laws that let them seize property of bad guys, mostly drug bad guys. That's questionable enough. This bill would let the police seize property without telling the owner. That would be, flat out, an Orwellian nightmare. As it stands, authorities can get a judge to approve a wiretap on your phone, and you'll never know about it unless and until you're charged. Federal law allows so-called sneak-and-peek warrants that allow agents to go into your home or business and confirm their suspicions about illegal activity. Now, the authorities want to push that line further - a lot further. The Clinton administration, which has done much to undermine the Fourth Amendment, supports this out-of-bounds idea. Fortunately, a lot of people - conservatives and liberals alike - do not. Let's hope they prevail and this provision is dropped. - --- MAP posted-by: Doc-Hawk