Pubdate: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 Source: National Review (US) Copyright: 2000 National Review Contact: 215 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10016 Website: http://www.nationalreview.com/ Forum: http://www.nationalreview.com/soapbox/soapbox.html Author: Jonah Goldberg, NRO editor SHALLOW CONVENTION Where John McCain Paid A Price Sunday H. L. Mencken once wrote, "There is something about a national convention that makes it as fascinating as a revival or a hanging. It is vulgar, it is ugly, it is stupid, it is tedious, it is hard upon the higher cerebral centers and the gluteus maximus, and yet it is somehow charming. One sits through the long sessions wishing heartily that all the delegates and alternates were dead and in hell -- and suddenly there comes a show so gaudy and hilarious, so melodramatic and obscene, so unimaginably exhilarating and preposterous that one lives a gorgeous year in an hour." I waited and waited but that exhilarating hour never arrived at "Shadow Convention." Tragically, Arianna Huffington has given birth to another silly idea. Entering the "convention hall" you realize right away that simply by being there you are lending credibility to a hoax. It's no "hall" in any real sense so much as a mid-size college auditorium. The University of Pennsylvania's "Annenberg Auditorium" is really the sort of venue where bad poets show their wares to the sorts of college kids who feel superior because they are able to endure bad poetry. While an exact headcount is impossible, I would wager that between 30 percent and 40 percent of the people filling the seats of the Shadow Convention on Sunday were either the press, staffers, or members of one speaker or another's entourage. There were no actual "delegates" in any real sense. Indeed, one wonders whether Huffington would have gone through with it all if C-SPAN hadn't promised to be there. As a political convention it had as much legitimacy as a "town meeting" in Colonial Williamsburg. One almost feels like the Shadow Convention will next appear at Epcot Center filling the space between Mickey Mouse's noontime parade and the all-bear jamboree. Say what you want about the staging and choreography of the Democratic and Republican conventions, but they are in fact real political events where grassroots activists participate in an admittedly staged but no less significant event. The Republicans and Democrats who earn a spot in a delegation worked to get there. The "delegates" at the Shadow Convention were simply cronies and lackeys of various liberal front groups or the beneficiaries of some truly "Big Money" from the likes of political dabblers like George Soros. Admittedly it's hard to take the whole thing too seriously because the organizers don't quite take themselves very seriously. To the extent the "event" resembles an actual convention it's only as farce. Rather than have state banners from you know, "states" like Texas or Kansas, young clever folk hold up banners reading "Disillusioned" and "2 Poor 4 Access" "Downsized" and "The Rest of Us." This sort of sophomoric satire and bottled outrage does little to persuade anyone who isn't still auditioning for the job of Eva Peron. At the convention Arianna Huffington says that she was "fooled" by Newt Gingrich but now she is serious about Sen. John McCain. "Senator McCain," she said in her introductory remarks. "You may not want the honor; but there would be no Shadow Convention without you." It seems pretty obvious he doesn't want that honor now. McCain gave a serious speech at an unserious event and he paid the price for it. Sitting just one seat over from me in the ample media seating section were three obvious "Remember Seattle!" vets. Two of them sported bandanas on their heads and jewelry on their faces. Before the event even began, some Shadow Convention organizers asked them to get up and move to a different section. They not only refused, the hemptivists pretended not to hear the repeated and heated requests. They sat there in what they thought was pacifist resistance. Only a coward of profound wussitude or someone totally convinced of man's innate goodness could conclude that these patchouli-soaked hemptivists were going to behave themselves. It was a sign of the not-ready-for-prime-time nature of the event that the flacks simply gave up. And, of course they heckled John McCain. "How many Indians have you killed?" shouted one. "Save black mesa" they chanted in unison, in reference to some great crime McCain is allegedly party to. More voices from the balcony chimed in, screaming "Genocide!" and various things about Peabody coal. Finally, McCain turned to someone offstage, presumably Huffington, and said "If you like I don't have to continue." By this time the crowd had turned on the young men and heckled them. For a moment it seemed like Menken's "exhilarating hour" was transpiring. But the moment died down right before it got really interesting. McCain finished his speech to some snickers (Al Franken and others in the crowd thought it was hilarious that McCain would support Gov. Bush and the Republican party). Once McCain left the stage -- in a huffy hurry -- a sizable chunk of the crowd left. What followed were a series of charming films from some black kids and some speeches about why drugs should be legal and how Americans need a guaranteed living wage and full access to health care. The event closed with Huffington and liberal comedian Al Franken attempting some "political satire." It's unclear how rehearsed the routine was, but it felt painfully so. Which one of them actually thinks there's chemistry between them is a mystery, but their stilted dialogue with each other seemed like a Burns and Allen routine without the marriage, affection, charm, or humor. Franken had some funny recycled lines about DNC fundraisers. Donate $100,000 and you get a slow waltz with Hillary, $50,000 you get a tango with Tipper, and for 50 bucks you get a lap dance from Janet Reno. And -- he left out -- for five dollars you get to never hear that joke again. The real fraud of this very shallow convention was not that it was what Daniel Boorstin would call a pseudo-event, but that it pretends to stand for some kind of "new" politics. Huffington reaches new heights of self-parody when she laments the influence of big money when it was her husband who broke the bank trying to buy a Senate seat. But that's beside the point -- cataloging the apostasy and hypocrisy of Huffington's latest incarnation could be a full-time occupation. No, the real fraud is, again, the idea that this is not simply the vanity cause of a bunch of leftist activists and limousine liberals. It is abundantly clear from the crowd that the campaign-finance-reform movement is really little more than an attempt of liberal interests to further regulate the form and content of American politics. The supporters of the Shadow Convention, almost without exception are liberal and left-libertarian social planners. The lobby outside was jammed with tables from warmed over socialist and gitchy-goo liberal groups. These are the people who believe their interests will be served by campaign-finance reform. Huffington claimed she was speaking for the 50 percent of Americans who don't plan to vote -- perhaps the easiest constituency to lay claim to other than the ranks of America's comatose. Ellen Miller, one of the leading campaign-finance reformers in America, said to the crowd "If someone is going to own this government, it might as well be us." The "us" she was referring to were sitting in the room. "Unless the problem of money in politics is solved, nothing else will ever change," Huffington said in perhaps her biggest applause line. This is not only a profoundly ignorant and ahistorical statement it is demagogic and cynical. The role of "big money" has been increasingly regulated in the last two generations. Do Huffington and her crowd honestly believe there's been no progress on the environment, civil rights, or economic prosperity? If so, they are fools. If they do recognize the progress and say this stuff anyway, they are liars. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Stevens