Pubdate: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 Source: Age, The (Australia) Copyright: 2000 David Syme & Co Ltd Contact: 250 Spencer Street, Melbourne, 3000, Australia Website: http://www.theage.com.au/ Author: Rupert Hamer Note: Rupert Hamer was Victorian Liberal Premier from 1972 to 1981. INJECTING ROOMS DESERVE A CHANCE On the controversial subject of supervised injecting rooms, the Liberal Party is right to consult widely before reaching a decision to support a trial. Nevertheless, the facts are becoming plain for all to see. The drug problem is getting worse, not better. Heroin deaths now exceed the road toll. Seventy per cent of those in prison are there for drug-related offences. Drug-related robberies and other crimes are growing. The impact on families and neighborhoods is serious. The best efforts of state and federal police can only intercept about 10 per cent of the drug traffic. Drug-pushing is immensely lucrative. The American Prohibition experience clearly demonstrated that simply declaring a product or practice illegal, and enforcing criminal penalties, is not enough. On the contrary, it encouraged the growth of a new criminal group, with speakeasies, sly-grog parlors and the whole apparatus for supplying the banned product, namely alcohol, to the market. The community demands strong action to deal with this growing menace, but it is clear the attack must be conducted on several fronts, and that enforcement needs powerful supporting measures to tackle not just the supply side, but the whole area of the demand, the reasons for it, and the handling of addiction. But there is real cause for optimism in the experience of two countries that have led the world in drug policy during the 1990s, Switzerland and Germany, that a four-pronged attack - prevention, treatment, harm reduction and law enforcement - does have positive results. The recent report of the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health on Swiss drug policy showed that since 1991: - - HIV and hepatitis have greatly decreased; - - deaths from drug overdose have been greatly reduced; - - drug-related crime has been substantially reduced; - - the open drug scenes have been eliminated; and - - the number of drug addicts in treatment has more than doubled. Thousands of drug addicts have been given the chance to recover and repair their lives. The point is that injecting centres have been a vital element in this broad-based attack, which is now supported by a strong consensus in both countries. It is a pity the Prime Minister should have as his adviser on drugs Brian Watters (whose views, incidentally, are not shared by many of his colleagues in the Salvation Army). He seems to have the narrow view on this, as on other constructive proposals, that it "would send the wrong message". On the contrary, the message would be one of compassion for the drug addicts and their families, and of positive action, to deal with a damaging and costly blight on our community. Finally, it is impressive to note the widespread support for this proposal, notably from those closest to the scene - the Australian Medical Association, ambulance employees, the Australian Drug Foundation - but also from broadly representatives bodies - the Bar Council, Law Institute, Institution of Engineers, Ethnic Communities Council, Chartered Practising Accountants and, most important, parliament's own Drug Advisory Committee under Dr David Penington, appointed by the previous Coalition government. Of course, the location of these centres is, and will be, the most contentious issue, and the Liberal Party would justly require close consultation with the people and areas most likely to be affected. It would also fairly insist that a range of facilities for treatment be offered as an integral part of the scheme. Finally, it could attach a "sunset clause", conditional on a strict and clear assessment of the effects of the scheme after a reasonable period. What would be unacceptable would be to deny support for at least a trial of this positive action, which could form a crucial part of a real effort to save lives and tackle a costly community menace. - --- MAP posted-by: greg