Pubdate: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 Source: Santa Barbara News-Press (CA) Section: By The Way Copyright: 2000 Santa Barbara News-Press Contact: P.O. Box 1359, Santa Barbara, CA 93102 Website: http://www.newspress.com/ Author: John Lankford, POLITICS, IN OUT OF THE SHADOWS A reader called the other day to get information on the Shadow Conventions. I confessed my ignorance, which is easier than it should be. After she hung up, I did a quick search through our wire services and came up with several stories about the Shadow Conventions, which didn't mention much in the way of specifics. All the stories, however, had one thing in common -- Arianna Huffington. The Shadow Conventions, as it turns out, were and are being held simultaneously with the regular GOP and Democratic conventions. Republicans met last week in Philadelphia, while Democrats meet in a few days in Los Angeles -- hoping perhaps to catch some of the energy left over at the Staples Center in the wake of the Lakers winning the NBA championship. I looked in my Rolodex to see if I still had Arianna's phone numbers. I don't, other than the one she gave me years ago for her Washington office, and the one in Montecito she and ex-husband Michael Huffington shared while they were still sharing things. They don't live in those places anymore. Arianna now lives somewhere in the Los Angeles Basin, possibly the Brentwood area, which may explain recent affiliations with celebrities she is enlisting in her crusade to reshape American politics. This should come as no surprise to anyone who knows Arianna. In brief encounters, I found her to be charming, funny, quick to laugh, totally disarming -- and someone with whom you would not willingly enter into a debate, unless you are comfortable with losing. Arianna told a reporter for Editor & Publisher magazine the reason she's doing the Shadow Conventions is because: "It seems to be a reflection of the vacuum the two parties have left. Political journalists are frustrated that the two parties have turned their conventions into completely scripted floor shows." As if that is something new. I lost interest in political conventions many years ago. I vote in every election, no matter how minor it might seem, because I feel that if I don't vote, I have no reasonable basis for griping about what candidates do once they achieve office. It makes no sense to not vote, then howl about bad government. As an every-time voter, I can howl all I want. My guess is Arianna is using the Shadow Conventions to shame Republicans and Democrats into allowing meaningful discussion of -- if not outright arguments about -- important issues. Remember when there used to be shouting matches at political conventions, when delegates with different points of view stood on the convention floor, ranting and shaking their fingers accusingly at each other? Actually, I don't remember that. It's been so long since the outcome at a major-party convention was anything but a foregone conclusion, the memory of such spirited exchanges is long gone. Which is why we now have Shadow Conventions, and which is why so many people are linking themselves to third parties, of which there are dozens. Ralph Nader is dropping by the News-Press later this month to tout his Green Party candidacy. It should be an interesting visit, because although Nader can't win the presidency, he apparently can cause a mess for Al Gore. According to polls, right now Nader has nearly 10 percent of the vote in California -- more than enough to give Al the jitters, because Nader's and Gore's voters are philosophically co-mingled. To make matters worse, a recent story in New Republic magazine opines that if Nader gets 3 to 5 percent of the vote in as few as seven key states, Gore loses. Arianna Huffington's emerging role in national politics is, well, interesting. It was clear throughout ex-husband Michael's various political adventures she was that duo's source of power. She had the forceful personality and political beliefs. She stated those beliefs clearly and without equivocation, a talent Michael never mastered. She has the easy, engaging politician's smile; Michael's smile was wooden, to be worn only when the situation dictated a need. I met Michael before his run against Bob Lagomarsino for the House seat. We were in the main lobby at the downtown Montecito Bank & Trust for a political event of some kind. I was introduced to him as the News-Press' political writer. Michael dismissed me in record time, a matter of seconds, the tip-off being that he kept glancing at his wristwatch and looking around as I asked questions about his candidacy. I met Arianna a few months later. She laughed at my jokes. There was no dismissal -- which, the way I understand the game, makes her a more accomplished politician than her former husband. I always wondered when Arianna would make her political move, and where she would position herself in the spectrum. Would it be as a reflexive conservative, in the Newt Gingrich mold? Or would she come from another direction. She chose another direction. She describes herself as a political progressive, a populist. The title of her new book is, "How to Overthrow The Government,'' which might still be a mantra for Republicans, if George Bush didn't have that lead in the polls. One objective of her Shadow Conventions is to get important people talking about things the major parties would just as soon keep in the closet. For example, how would the GOP handle a debate on dealing with the ever-increasing disparity between rich and poor? Will Gore willingly open a discussion at the Democrats' convention of the rotten, deceptive way political campaigns are financed? Would either major candidate talk frankly about the miserable, expensive failure of America's war on drugs? Those are issues with which every politician at the national level should be dealing. I'm not holding my breath. John Lankford is editorial page editor of the News-Press. Write to him at P.O. Box 1359, Santa Barbara, Ca.; phone: 564-5161; e-mail: --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D