Pubdate: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 Source: Ottawa Sun (CN ON) Copyright: 2000, Canoe Limited Partnership Contact: 380 Hunt Club Rd., Ottawa, Ontario, K1G 5H7 Website: http://www.canoe.ca/OttawaSun/ Forum: http://www.canoe.ca/Chat/home.html Author: Dave Haans, http://www.mapinc.org/writers/Dave+Hanns MADELY WRONG ON NEEDLE EXCHANGE Re "Needle exchange does more harm than good," by Steve Madely (Aug. 10): Madely tries valiantly to make the assertion that needle exchange programs have actually caused infection rates to rise in major urban centres, including Ottawa. But, he never discusses what is really causing the rates to rise. In his main argument, he fails to note that in most of the main urban centres in this country, there has been a huge increase in the number of addicts injecting crack cocaine rather than (or, in addition to) heroin. Since crack cocaine is typically injected many more times than heroin would be, this has led to much more needle use, and resulted in more people both sharing dirty needles and using needle exchange programs. Of course, this means that we can expect the statistics to show that those using needle exchange programs are more at risk, and also accounts for the rise in infectious diseases among users. Combine this with a pitiful lack of treatment centres, over-reliance on police and the courts to uselessly try to deal with what is a health and not a legal issue, and you have an extremely serious health situation that is not going to go away no matter how many times you decry the lack of morality in today's society. Madely tries to shrug all of this off by writing that needle exchange programs have caused a rise in infectious diseases. However, this is like saying that providing treatment for alcoholics simply means that more people will drink because the resources are there. Trying to say that this is the result of a "permissive society" is just as wrong -- would Madely also try to assert that if he had access to condoms in high school, he would have had more romantic partners in Grade 12? I know I couldn't! But, in the end, Madely's biggest mistakes are his assertions that more policing and forced treatment will solve these serious drug problems. One needs to only glance at the U.S., where rapists and murderers are routinely let out of prison early to make room for non-violent drug offenders serving horrendous mandatory minimums. And, with respect to forced treatment, that approach has never worked to reduce drug use, period. Why not have voluntary treatment beds readily available so that when someone addicted to heroin or cocaine really wants to quit, they don't face a soul-crushing six-month waiting period? It would be an order of magnitude cheaper than relying on police and the courts to try to (but rarely) heal our sick. Dave Haans Toronto (Your first point only makes sense if you assume crack users get their needles solely from needle exchange programs, but at least we'll agree there needs to be more treatment programs) - --- MAP posted-by: Keith Brilhart