Pubdate: Wed, 23 Aug 2000
Source: Washington Post (DC)
Copyright: 2000 The Washington Post Company
Contact:  1150 15th Street Northwest, Washington, DC 20071
Feedback: http://washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/edit/letters/letterform.htm
Website: http://www.washingtonpost.com/
Authors: Steven Dudley, Special to The Washington Post

COLOMBIAN GROUPS SAY U.S. AID ENDANGERS THEM

BOGOTA, Colombia, Aug. 22 - More than 100 Colombian nongovernmental 
organizations have banded together to resist the government's $7.5 billion 
anti-drug plan, complaining that it has been co-opted by a U.S. military 
strategy that would make their participation unethical and put them in 
danger if they accept government aid.

"This plan is just going to make the war worse," said Diego Perez, head of 
a Jesuit human rights think tank, the Center for Investigation and Popular 
Education, who belongs to a loosely knit coalition called Peace Colombia 
that opposes the government's Plan Colombia.

"By militarizing this conflict, you're not going to resolve the guerrilla 
or the drug problem," he said.

The government says the groups that make up Peace Colombia - including 
human rights, indigenous, economic development and environmental 
organizations - are in the minority. "I think [this argument] is being used 
by some NGOs that don't really feel that Plan Colombia should be 
implemented," said Jaime Ruiz, a presidential adviser. "We need to look at 
this from a larger perspective."

Ruiz said he is focusing on aiding the country's big economic development 
organizations, most of which have said they are willing to work through 
Plan Colombia. Although some U.N. and European Union officials here have 
voiced doubts about the plan's wisdom in private, their international 
organizations have not taken positions and are expected to cooperate.

The small Colombian groups' refusal to participate, therefore, is seen more 
as a protest gesture and measure of concern than a serious obstacle to the 
U.S.-backed plan put forward by President Andres Pastrana.

Members of Peace Colombia said some of them could be put in danger if they 
take the aid, and all of them have said they will not accept any money from 
the U.S. government. "Anything that sounds like Plan Colombia is going to 
become a military target," Perez said. "We see this as one big package, in 
which you can't differentiate the military from the social part."

The United States is giving $1.3 billion to aid Plan Colombia, most of it 
in the form of military hardware, intelligence equipment and training for 
Colombian troops to battle leftist rebels in drug-producing areas. To make 
sure the aid goes forward, reports in Washington said, President Clinton 
has decided to sign a national security waiver exempting the Colombian 
military from human rights standards laid down by the U.S. Congress.

National security was invoked because U.S. officials say drug production in 
Colombia has ballooned with guerrilla involvement. This Andean nation 
supplies the United States with 80 percent of its cocaine and much of its 
heroin.

About half of Plan Colombia's $7.5 billion in expenditures will go toward 
social and economic programs, and Peace Colombia representatives said that 
by signing the waiver on human rights, Clinton confirmed their belief that 
this is a plan for war. They argue that the military offensive it is 
designed to promote will cripple efforts to wean small farmers away from 
producing illicit crops.

The 17,000-member Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, the country's 
largest rebel group, is said to be threatening local farmers' unions that 
may receive money. Community leaders in the southern province of Putumayo - 
a guerrilla stronghold and the principal target zone for the first batch of 
Colombian and U.S. money - have said death threats prevent them from 
organizing efforts to voluntarily substitute legal crops for coca, the raw 
material of cocaine, as outlined by Plan Colombia's creators.

But Ruiz, the presidential adviser, said the government is going to 
increase its presence in places like Putumayo so community organizations 
can resist guerrilla pressure. "You need to come in with the necessary 
strength so you're not going to give them a few pesos and leave them 
again," Ruiz said in an interview. "They need to know . . . that they're 
going to be supported."

Ruiz said the plan needs the military component to back up the social 
component, but admitted there may difficulties in implementing it. "Are we 
going to have problems? Yes," Ruiz said. "We're going to need to give these 
people security."

But many people may be caught in the cross-fire, according to Jorge Rojas, 
the head of the Consultancy for Human Rights and Refugees, a 
nongovernmental organization that works with people fleeing the conflict 
and is part of Peace Colombia. While groups that accept the aid could 
become targets of the rebels, those that do not accept it could become 
targets for right-wing paramilitary organizations, Rojas said.

"I would hope that they [Peace Colombia groups] are as committed as we are 
to improving the situation," a U.S. official in Bogota said. "And if we can 
do something constructive with them, then I would think they would want to 
be a part of that."

The official added that the total budget of the U.S. civilian aid agency in 
Colombia has gone from $9 million per year to $280 million for the next two 
years. But it is up to the Colombian government to provide the protection 
for these U.S.-funded projects and up to local groups to decide whether 
they can accept the funds.

Next month, European Union countries as well as Japan, Canada and 
Switzerland will meet with the Colombian government for the second time in 
three months to decide how best to contribute to Pastrana's effort. 
Colombia is expecting to receive close to $900 million from these 
countries, but so far only Spain has said it will channel money through 
Plan Colombia.

The rest have said they are troubled by the Colombian's military approach 
and would like to see more consultation between the government and 
nongovernmental groups. The European Union ambassador in Colombia, Candido 
Rodriguez, said there is even talk of consulting with rebel groups.

"We can't start a project without being sure that it can be implemented," 
Rodriguez said. "It would be interesting for the Colombian government to 
talk to the guerrillas so that a project that the EU is going to implement 
in a specific area at least has an agreement from the [Revolutionary Armed 
Forces of Colombia] not to intervene militarily."
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jo-D