Pubdate: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 Source: Seattle Times (WA) Copyright: 2000 The Seattle Times Company Contact: P.O. Box 70, Seattle, WA 98111 Fax: (206) 382-6760 Website: http://www.seattletimes.com/ Author: George Gedda CLINTON TAKES HEAT FOR NOD ON COLOMBIA DRUG-WAR AID WASHINGTON - Human-rights groups and two Senate Democrats yesterday assailed President Clinton's decision to release $1.3 billion to Colombia to fight its drug trade, and drop several conditions that the nation improve its human-rights record. Clinton said withholding the aid package would not give the drug program and other goals of Colombian President Andres Pastrana a chance to succeed. Clinton also said Pastrana is committed to protecting human rights. "He has submitted legislation to the Colombian parliament, for example, for civil trials for allegations of military abuses of human rights. And we also have a system in place for specific case-by-case investigation of serious allegations," he said. If Clinton had not signed the waiver, Colombia would have been denied $50 million in human-rights assistance, which is part of the overall package. And it would have been awkward for him to go empty-handed on his trip to Colombia next week. But some Senate Democrats sharply criticized the waiver. Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont said the human-rights conditions imposed by Congress do not require perfection, but at least "we need to see consistent compliance with the conditions, and they are not even close to that. There is no need or justification for waiving the conditions," Leahy said. Sen. Paul Wellstone, D-Minn., said, "Waiving the human-rights conditions is a profound mistake. It sends a dangerous message to the Colombian army and Colombia's civilian leadership that U.S. commitment to human rights does not go beyond mere rhetoric." Human-rights groups in Colombia expressed disapproval of Clinton's decision. "It is a grave error," said Jorge Rojas, director of the Agency for Human Rights and the Displaced. He said Clinton's message was that fighting drugs was more important than stopping the murders, torture and disappearances of noncombatants by the military and its right-wing paramilitary allies. "How can Washington say that the problem of human rights is still grave and then send more money that will worsen the situation?" Rojas asked. - --- MAP posted-by: John Chase