Pubdate: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 Source: Kansas City Star (MO) Copyright: 2000 The Kansas City Star Contact: 1729 Grand Blvd., Kansas City, Mo. 64108 Feedback: http://www.kansascity.com/Discussion/ Website: http://www.kcstar.com/ Author: Karen Dillon, The Kansas City Star Cited: The Criminal Justice Policy Foundation: http://www.cjpf.org/ Bookmark: MAP's link to all of Karen Dillon's outstanding forfeiture articles: http://www.mapinc.org/authors/dillon+karen TO PROTECT AND COLLECT Bush Would Create Commission To Examine Police Problems If he is elected president, George W. Bush plans to create a national commission that would examine controversies that have arisen in law enforcement and the criminal justice system in recent years. The commission could result in sweeping changes not seen since 1967, the last time a U.S. president convened such a group, several law enforcement officials and legal experts said. Democratic candidate Al Gore did not commit to establishing a commission but would deal with problems in a strong fashion if he saw evidence that action was needed, said Alex Zaroulis, Gore's Missouri spokeswoman. Bush and Gore issued statements to The Kansas City Star in response to questions the newspaper posed about drug forfeiture abuses and in response to a call from the International Association of Chiefs of Police for a commission. The police chiefs association asked the presidential candidates to support a national commission to investigate perceived police and criminal justice abuses. One of those issues, the association has said, is drug forfeiture. Col. Michael D. Robinson, president of the police chiefs association and director of the Michigan State Police, said law enforcement in America today has lost the public's trust and confidence. "We stand at a critical point in our history," Robinson said. "We in many cities have worse tensions between police and the community than at any other time in recent history." Ray Sullivan, Bush's deputy press secretary, said the Republican candidate expected the commission "to evaluate changing demands and challenges facing law enforcement and our justice system." In recent years the reputation of law enforcement and the criminal justice system has been hammered coast to coast from such controversies as illegal seizures, racial profiling, forced confessions from suspects, and police beatings and shootings. Several aspects of the judicial system also have come under fire, such as the death penalty and crowded prisons. Gene Voegtlin, legislative counsel for the police chiefs association, said the organization was pleased with Bush's support, adding that the association hoped Gore, too, would respond to keep the issue bipartisan. Drug forfeitures were the subject of a series of stories The Star published in May showing police across the country were evading state laws to improperly keep millions of dollars in cash and property seized in drug busts and traffic stops. Most states have laws that prohibit police from directly benefiting from seizures in drug cases, because they see that as a dangerous conflict of interest. Several states send the money to public education. But police are able to keep much of the money by handing seizures off to federal agencies, which keep a portion and return up to 80 percent to police. Critics fear that allowing police to profit from fighting crime can lead to other abuses such as racial profiling. "Part of what is driving some of the racial-profiling problem is this economic motivation to make large numbers of (traffic) stops," said John Crew, director of the Campaign Against Racial Profiling arm of the American Civil Liberties Union. Vice President Gore's state, Tennessee, has some of the least stringent state forfeiture laws in the country. Even so, the Memphis Police Department has been under investigation by a number of agencies, including the FBI and the state auditor, for corruption in its handling of drug money. Last month four high-ranking employees were fired. Gore supports existing forfeiture laws, as well as more funding for both law enforcement and education, Zaroulis said. The Star found that in Texas, where Bush is governor, police publicly acknowledge that they bypass state law and use federal law, which makes it easier for them to forfeit money and keep much of it. Robinson said the police chiefs association began considering a national commission as a result of its research into the racial-profiling controversy that has exploded across the country in recent years. "It did not take us long to recognize that there are issues that affect the public's confidence in the entire criminal justice system," Robinson said. The 1967 national commission under President Lyndon B. Johnson was effective, Robinson said. The commission worked a year and a half, producing 200 specific recommendations involving all levels of government, as well as civic, business and religious organizations, according to the police chiefs association. "The commission and its recommendations marked the beginning of a sea change in our methods for dealing with crime and the public, and built the framework for many of the exemplary programs that continue today," according to the police chiefs association. The recommendations came at a time of rioting in many major cities, increasing police brutality and high crime rates. Among the recommendations were community policing, better fingerprint recognition systems and a single, uniform police telephone number, which has evolved into 911, officials for the police chiefs association said. A recommendation for a national commission was met with praise from many organizations around the country, but at the same time they cautioned that it should not become another blue-ribbon committee report that is quickly shelved. For example, Eric Sterling, president of The Criminal Justice Policy Forum in Washington and former counsel for the House Judiciary Committee, said his organization has supported such a commission for a number of years. But he cautioned that Congress authorized a commission after the Ruby Ridge FBI standoff in Idaho, but its report was a "nonevent." Crew, who has worked on police reform issues for 15 years, said unless politicians find the will to stand up to law enforcement, the commission recommendations would barely see daylight. He pointed to the powerful anti-reform police organizations as a huge barrier that politicians can't get over. "Police misconduct persists on a widespread basis in the United States not because we don't know the solutions," Crew said. "It's because we lack the political will to implement those solutions. The question is whether a presidential commission would increase or decrease that political will." But a commission could find it difficult to bridge the huge philosophical divide over issues such as the war on drugs, said Roger Pilon, a constitutional expert and vice president for legal affairs with the Cato Institute, a Libertarian think tank. As a result, some problems are "simply intractable," said Pilon, who nonetheless supports creation of such a commission. The Forfeitures Endanger American Rights, a national organization that opposes the drug war, has endorsed the concept of a commission but remains concerned that major issues such as police corruption would not be addressed. But the police chiefs association should be commended for taking such a controversial stand, said association member Joseph McNamara, who was a police chief in San Jose and Kansas City and a national expert in policing at the Hoover Institution. "I think it deserves credit for this kind of call for candid self-analysis," McNamara said. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake