Pubdate: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 Source: Western Producer (CN SN) Copyright: 2000 The Western Producer Contact: Box 2500, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7K 2C4 Fax: (306) 934-2401 Website: http://www.producer.com/ Author: Roberta Rampton, Winnipeg bureau AMERICAN POLICY HAZE CONFOUNDS HEMP SHIPPER Jean Laprise declared it a "win" for the Canadian hemp industry when hemp seed shipments to the United States resumed in November. So he was shocked to find hemp exports are again under a microscope. "I couldn't believe the U.S. government could be so irrational and change their mind so quickly," said Laprise, a farmer and president of Kenex Ltd., a processor in Chatham, Ont. On Dec. 30, the Office of the National Drug Control Policy instructed U.S. customs officials to start seizing hemp seed and products that contain any amount of tetrahydrocannabinol. THC is the psychoactive ingredient that produces the euphoric feeling in hemp's illicit cousin, marijuana. Industrial hemp contains only minute levels of THC. Kenex spent considerable time and money last fall fighting a U.S. custom seizure of hemp birdseed. When the three-month-long trade argument was resolved in late November, hemp seed processors thought exports would go back to normal. But the peace was short-lived. Now, U.S. drug czar Barry McCaffrey and the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration will review hemp imports to make sure they're in line with the U.S. war against drugs. The Canadian government is monitoring the situation. Since January, Kenex has made small shipments of hemp products with undetectable levels of THC. But Laprise is waiting to find out how the U.S. government plans to test THC levels, and what its tolerance levels will be. If it decides to test in parts per billion, the industry would be in trouble, said Laprise. "I think there should be a very cautious approach to production unless there are firm markets for all goods," said a weary-sounding Laprise. If trade grinds to a halt, the government should consider a trade challenge, or the industry should consider a legal challenge, said Laprise. But he and his business partners, after enduring months of business interruption last fall, and extensive legal bills, are doing some "soul searching" to determine whether more legal action is worth the effort. Industrial Versus Narcotic Geof Kime of Hempline, which produces hemp fibre products in southern Ontario, said his shipping schedule has not been affected. Hemp fibre does not contain THC, said Kime. But his company has been hurt by negative publicity linking industrial hemp to its narcotic relative. Kime said misleading media headlines have prompted questions from potential customers about the legality of shipping hemp fabric and carpet across the border. Greg Herriot, whose company Hempola buys hemp from Manitoba farmers, said his company's blended oils, salad dressings and cosmetics contain non-detectable levels of THC, and haven't been affected by the U.S. action. But Hempola is sponsoring a study in Berkeley, Calif., that will measure whether THC from its products show up in urine analysis tests, the random employee checks done by many U.S. companies. Herriot suspects the products will come up clean. In September, his partner Kelly Smith took a drug test after eating up to two tablespoons of Hempola oil per day, washing with hemp soap daily, and using other hemp cosmetic products for three years. She tested negative. - --- MAP posted-by: Derek Rea