Pubdate: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 Source: Vancouver Sun (CN BC) Copyright: The Vancouver Sun 2000 Contact: 200 Granville Street, Ste.#1, Vancouver BC V6C 3N3 Fax: (604) 605-2323 Website: http://www.vancouversun.com/ Author: Gabriel Yiu VANCOUVER PACT TURNS NEW PAGE ON DEALING WITH THE DRUG PLAGUE Both legal toughness and medical treatment are required to deal with illegal drugs on our streets. The Vancouver Agreement announced last Friday does something new: It tries to reconcile the two camps of concerned people regarding the problem of drugs in the Downtown Eastside. The agreement offers comprehensive services to drug users on the one hand and promises stricter law enforcement on the other. It promises to help drug users by providing them with a package of medical, counseling, job training, housing and remedial measures. It includes the setting up of a treatment centre. With an even hand, it also promises to increase the policing of Chinatown, Gastown, Oppenheimer Park and Strathcona to crack down on drug traffickers, and to beautify the areas. It does not include the setting up of a drug injection centre. It is no easy matter to conduct a rational discussion about the problem of drugs in the Chinese community. Besides cultural differences, there are also local politics -- which can create distortions, prejudices and confusion. In North America, the hippie culture has left its mark. U.S. and Canadian citizens are more tolerant of drugs. Drug takers in the 1960s are now political and public figures, even occupying the highest offices. In Asia, drugs are seen as predatory beasts, to be shunned at all cost. The Opium War sparked a national disgrace in the loss of Hong Kong to Britain, and opium was partially blamed for the weakness of the Chinese army in the conflict. While the English-language media have recently given prominence to European models of dealing with drugs, the Chinese media stick to the Asian model. Many Chinese-Canadians would say "Drug addiction is not such a serious problem in Asia. Why don't we follow the Asian example?" A writer who researched and wrote about overseas Chinese history for a Chinese newspaper recently delivered his view on drugs. He said he had talks with other intellectuals and they agreed that since Canada has abolished the death penalty, drug dealers should at least be given life sentences while addicts should be sent to labour camps and be forced to rid themselves of drugs. Vancouver Councillor Don Lee, writing in a Chinese newspaper, commended the virtues of the 19th-century Chinese commissioner who burned British ships carrying opium to China, which started the Opium War. Such views find ready resonance in the Asian community. They go beyond arguments on how to deal with the drug problem, and evidence differences between East and West on social values, civil liberty, humanity and legal concepts. A revealing case occurred recently. A Canadian citizen was executed for allegedly carrying drugs in Vietnam. The incident demonstrates not only the differences mentioned, but also the fact that even in a country where the death penalty is in place for drug trafficking, it is not free from drug problems. That's why the Vancouver Agreement is an important first step, even if it cannot provide a complete solution to the persistent drug problem. Injection houses or not, addicts will administer drugs in the back alleys and even main streets. On the other hand, an injection house will attract addicts from far and wide. The police may be instructed to get tough on crime and make more arrests, but how much of a deterrent is the lenient justice system? Where there is a market, there is supply. As long as addicts crave drugs, there will be pushers and ways of expanding the market by luring more people into the habit. A proposed government supply of drugs for addicts may drive out the pushers but is unacceptable to many citizens. After all, the federal government's approval of the medical use of marijuana came about only after a court ruling. Getting the drug users to give up drugs is of course the ideal solution, but it is easier said than done. Even one successful attempt to kick the habit is no guarantee it will not resurface. People should take both a rational and concerned attitude towards the problem. The lax way in which police previously carried out the law against drug trafficking and drug possession has not worked, and the deterioration of the problem has caused increased dissatisfaction and anger among citizens. But people should also understand that approaching the problem simply by law enforcement and forcing addicts to give up drugs will not solve anything. - --- MAP posted-by: Terry Liittschwager