Pubdate: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 Source: San Jose Mercury News (CA) Copyright: 2000 San Jose Mercury News Contact: 750 Ridder Park Drive, San Jose, CA 95190 Fax: (408) 271-3792 Website: http://www.sjmercury.com/ Author: Frazier Moore BALANCED LOOK AT DRUG WAR FRONTLINE: DRUG WARS 10 p.m. Monday and Tuesday Ch. 9 9 p.m. Oct. 16 and 23 Ch. 54 NEW YORK -- After three decades, the war on drugs is largely a bust. That's one finding of "Drug Wars," an epic exploration into the U.S. government's battle to stem the flow of illegal drugs. Examinations of the drug problem are usually framed from the perspective of the users or the cops who bust them on the street. But the four-hour "Frontline" report, which PBS airs tonight and Tuesday, lets viewers hear from high-level government officials and traffickers, drug agents and drug lords, including men who once headed Colombia's notorious Medellin cartel, which the film identifies as the world's largest-ever criminal syndicate. More than a year in the making, "Drug Wars" takes an inside look at the drug business, including footage of the ambush of an entire division of Mexico's federal drug police by a unit of the Mexican army protecting a drug operation. Nixon era start The story begins in the first days of Richard Nixon's presidency. "You can imagine the challenge trying to lay out for an audience the last 30 years," says reporter and co-producer Lowell Bergman, adding, "I think people will be surprised that Nixon turns out to be the most effective in terms of getting control of a particular drug, in this case heroin." In 1970, a controversial program of dispensing to addicts the new synthetic opiate methadone was launched by a White House concerned that, outside its door, the nation's capital had become the crime capital. A year after clinics opened around Washington, burglaries had dropped by 41 percent. The message seemed clear. With treatment, addicts could be helped to overcome their habit. And while they were helped, they no longer had to steal to support that habit -- nor were they supporting illegal drug trade. Even so, Nixon wasn't ready to launch a national methadone treatment program. Then, a year later, he was shocked to learn of raging heroin use by American troops in Vietnam. This put a far more sympathetic face on the junkie. With that, the law-and-order president unveiled a drug program that addressed drug abuse as a sickness, not a crime. And as the sonorous "Frontline" narrator declares, "For the first and only time in the history of U.S. drug policy, treatment supplanted law enforcement for most of the attention and most of the money." Better strategy While Bergman insists that "Drug Wars" draws no particular conclusions, he says he and his collaborators were struck by an unexpected argument echoed by virtually every drug-enforcement official they talked to: The better strategy is trying to reduce demand rather than shut off supply and punish consumers. Nixon, it seems, had started on the right track. In the film, former Drug Enforcement Administration head Jack Lawn calls for a new, centralized anti-drug force that devotes a full 90 percent of its budget to education, treatment and prevention. "Would that work? We won't know unless we try it," Lawn says. "But 20 years of doing it the other way certainly has not worked." What happened to derail Nixon's treatment-oriented strategy? As the 1972 election approached, the White House reverted to a more voter-friendly approach: Get tough on drugs and anyone who does them. That has summed up the nation's drug policy ever since. "No one wants to be seen as soft on crime," Bergman says. The film compiles some of the consequences. The United States fights the drug war with a bureaucracy that, next year, will total 51 government agencies spending some $20 billion in federal money. The U.S. prison population has doubled since 1994 to nearly 2 million inmates -- half of whom are jailed on drug-related charges. Meanwhile, the global narcotics business is worth about $400 billion, and rapidly expanding. - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D