Pubdate: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 Source: San Luis Obispo County Tribune (CA) Copyright: 2000 The Tribune Contact: P.O. Box 112, San Luis Obispo, CA 93406-0112 Fax: 805.781.7905 Website: http://www.thetribunenews.com/ Author: Erin Green, The Tribune Note: The Associated Press contributed to this report. Bookmark: For Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act items: http://www.mapinc.org/prop36.htm ACTIVISTS SEND MESSAGE AGAINST WAR ON DRUGS Proposition 36, Legal Usage Were Themes Of Event The war on drugs and a ballot measure on treatment for convicted drug users took center stage in downtown San Luis Obispo on Sunday afternoon when about 100 people turned out for the 8th Annual Hemp Rally and Teach-In. With less than a month to go until Election Day, an eclectic mix of drug-rights activists, civil-rights defenders and interested passersby collected on the lawn and patio in front of the San Luis Obispo County Government Center. The event was hosted by SLO Hemp for Victory, a grassroots group promoting the legalization of marijuana and awareness about the law and drugs. "What we've got is a system that isn't working," said Dia McAfee, one of the main organizers of the event. "We want to educate people and the government to the fact that ... there are alternatives to the current system." One speaker, Jaz McKay, told the crowd that the war on drugs "does more harm to our individual rights than any other action the government has ever taken." McKay also said there is a concentrated effort on the part of the government to "slowly erode all of our rights." Hank Alberts, president of the San Luis Obispo chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, spoke about a concerted effort by the ACLU and six other organizations. The groups want to put an initiative on next year's ballot to create a citizen's oversight board for local law enforcement agencies. The idea was prompted by civil rights complaints received by the ACLU. "We need to hold all public agencies accountable for what they do," Alberts said. "It's in the tradition of the Constitution of the United States." Speakers also used the day to discuss one of the upcoming ballot measures, Proposition 36. The measure would require that first- and second-time offenders receive treatment instead of jail time for being under the influence of drugs or possessing drugs for personal use. "The problem is that the judicial system has been handcuffed," said Carol-jo Papac, a former San Luis Obispo resident and speaker at the event, referring to the mandatory punishments drug offenders currently receive. "Judges have no say in this already." The proposition's opponents say the proposal would undermine the state's drug court system. The California Association of Drug Court Professionals, a group consisting of state judges, held a news conference in Los Angeles last week to voice their opinions on the measure. "Judges seldom speak out on political issues, but this is an issue that will directly affect our courts and cripple our drug courts," Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Stephen Manley told the Associated Press. "Proposition 36 will spend $120 million (each year for 51/2 years) on treatment that will not work," Manley said. "What does work is when you hold drug addicts accountable." McAfee disagrees and says the prison environment does more harm than it does good. "Prison is an inhumane place," she said. "It causes a lot of damage. It causes people harm. You can only heal someone by being putting them in a healthy environment." The Associated Press contributed to this report. - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D