Pubdate: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 Source: Indianapolis Star (IN) Copyright: 2000 Indianapolis Newspapers Inc. Contact: http://www.starnews.com/ Forum: http://forum.circlecity.com/circlecity/index.html Author: Barry McCaffrey Note: McCaffrey is director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy. Bookmark: OPEDs and LTEs by Barry McCaffrey: http://www.mapinc.org/mccaffrey.htm DRUG COURTS AND PROGRAMS REDUCE ABUSE Drug-dependent individuals are responsible for a disproportionately large percentage of violent crimes and property offenses such as assault, rape, murder, robbery, burglary and theft. According to the National Institute of Justice's Arrestee and Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) report, roughly two-thirds of adult arrestees and more than half of juvenile arrestees test positive for at least one illicit drug. A third of state prisoners and about one in five federal prisoners said they committed their offenses while under the influence of drugs. Many criminals turned to crime for money to support expensive drug habits. Therefore, drug-related behavior takes up a significant portion of America's law enforcement and corrections budgets. Drug users commit about half of all felonies in big cities. Drug abusers constitute about half the people on probation and parole in America (some 2.5 million). Three-quarters of chronic cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine users are arrested in the course of any given year. Only a quarter of these people received drug treatment in the past. Most return to drugs as soon as they complete their prison terms. Throughout the U.S., 2 million arrested drug users a year require treatment to extricate themselves from lives of crime. Because so many drug addicts become involved with the criminal justice system, this venue is a natural place to offer drug treatment. Studies prove that when people are forced into therapy, results are positive. Unfortunately, only a small proportion of defendants requesting drug treatment currently are helped. Without effective intervention, we are merely postponing the time when offenders return to drugs and crime. Research indicates that therapy lasting longer than 90 days is much more likely to reduce drug use and crime. Follow-up is also important. An evaluation conducted by Dr. James Inciardi demonstrated that prisoners who participated in transitional work-release following in-prison drug treatment were twice as likely to remain drug free and a third more likely to be arrest free 18 months after release, compared to inmates who received no such supervision. These findings need to be given careful attention at a time when probation and other intermediate measures are generally being eliminated. Drug treatment, coupled with various forms of rehabilitation, such as literacy and job training, yields the best results. From 1980 to 1996, the number of people in U.S. prisons tripled, largely due to substance abuse. The cost to taxpayers of keeping a person in jail is about $25,000 a year. The expense of treatment is tiny by comparison. Experience has shown that we can't arrest our way out of the drug problem. Today, 700 drug courts have been instituted or are in the planning stages throughout the United States, up from the dozen that existed in 1994. These courts offer drug treatment as an alternative to incarceration for non-violent offenders. Defendants who complete the drug court program either have their charges dismissed or sentences reduced. More than 100,000 people have been diverted to drug courts, which saves money and lives. Drug courts and other diversionary programs currently reach only 3 percent of the criminal justice population. In the interest of public safety as well as humane and effective correctional policy, drug courts, drug-free prisons and drug treatment for law-breakers should be expanded. Ultimately, such programs will reduce overall drug abuse in America. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake