Pubdate: Mon, 20 Nov 2000
Source: National Review (US)
Copyright: 2000 National Review
Contact:  215 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10016
Website: http://www.nationalreview.com/
Forum: http://www.nationalreview.com/forum/forum.shtml
Author: William F. Buckley Jr.

THE POT WARS GO ON

Tony Knowles is the young, dashing, Democratic governor of Alaska, and he 
cannot like it to be treated as an old fogey, which is what is happening. 
One aggressor writes in the Anchorage Daily News on Monday asking the 
governor to grow up on the question of Proposition 5. If this proposition 
is approved, marijuana would be legal in Alaska, as it is in the 
Netherlands and (de facto) in France, and prospectively in Switzerland. The 
writer entitled his message to the governor, "Alaska adults can decide if 
pot is good for them."

Now that formulation is unsafe.

Alaska adults can't decide whether pot is good for them; they can decide 
whether to use pot, never mind whether it's good for them or isn't. The 
position of the Anchorage Daily News article is, quite simply, that if you 
want to smoke pot in Alaska, all you have to do is buy it on the black 
market where it is readily available.

The alternative, under Proposition 5, would be to buy it from licensed 
sellers, paying a royalty to the state exchequer, which would oversee 
questions of quality and, of course, distribution. Kids could always buy it 
even if it were proscribed, but then kids can do anything, including smoke 
tobacco, consume liquor, and procreate. And now hear this: Proposition 5 
goes further, creating a commission to examine reparations for people whose 
assets have been seized in the ongoing travesty on civil rights, which 
authorizes confiscation of property, and often encourages it by permitting 
such property to meander over into police treasuries.

In Utah there is a similar plebiscite before the voters, called Initiative 
B, the Utah Property Protection Act. There is high dudgeon in Utah 
protesting the long arm of George Soros, the billionaire who has made an 
alleviation of the drug-penalty laws a cause.

His motives in doing so are, not persuasively, explained by an associate, 
Ethan Nadelmann, who heads up the Lindesmith Center, a drug-policy research 
institute in New York. It's as simple as this, says Nadelmann: Soros's 
father was a Jewish lawyer in Naziland. He shielded his 14-year-old son by 
changing his name and having him pose as a godson of a government official.

The boy had then to accompany his guardian, who went about confiscating the 
homes of Hungarian Jews sent to Auschwitz. This (we are told) permanently 
sensitized Soros to the dangers of statist usurpations. Many Utah lawmakers 
acknowledge the extremity of the state's law-enforcement establishment, but 
insist that moderated behavior should be an instrument of the legislature, 
not plebiscitary eruptions financed by a billionaire on the loose. Local 
supporters of Initiative B comment that human rights are not of mere 
parochial concern.

They point out that the Mormon community in Utah felt no compunction about 
lobbying against gay marriages in Hawaii.

What's inching along, with tortured slowness, is a reaction against the 
excesses of the marijuana laws. Critics of moderation correctly point out 
that there is a difference between a reform of the marijuana laws designed 
to permit patients to get relief from marijuana, and flat-out legalization. 
Dr. Herbert Kleber, a professor of psychiatry at Columbia and medical 
director of the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, makes the 
point that there is less reason to put medical marijuana on the ballot than 
the legalization of it. "They really are two totally different issues.

One is in many ways a political issue, but the other is a scientific issue.

Marijuana for medicinal purposes should not be decided by referendum. Would 
you have had a referendum on penicillin for pneumonia?"

But that license, acknowledged and approved in California, Hawaii, Oregon, 
Washington, Arizona, Alaska, Maine, and D.C., is being used to propel the 
more general sanctions, as under Proposition 5 in Alaska. California's 
Mendocino County, upholding the tradition that Californians will 
always-somewhere, somehow-identify themselves with extremes, has scheduled 
a county initiative which would permit anyone to grow marijuana anywhere in 
Mendocino. There is cultural attraction to the idea, in part because 
Mendocino is a fertile area for the best pot-or so, I hasten to comment, I 
have heard.

Although the subject comes up, it certainly will not appear on the agenda 
of either of the political parties.

In little enclaves of intelligence and courage one spots the exceptions: 
Gov. Gary Johnson of New Mexico and (former) mayor Kurt Schmoke of 
Baltimore. But all that can be said with absolute confidence about them is 
that they will never run for national office.

Even with George Soros behind them.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jo-D