Pubdate: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 Source: Akron Beacon-Journal (OH) Copyright: 2000 by the Beacon Journal Publishing Co. Contact: http://www.ohio.com/bj/ Forum: http://krwebx.infi.net/webxmulti/cgi-bin/WebX?abeacon DRUG SUSPECT MAY GET NEW TRIAL WITHOUT FACING KEY EVIDENCE CLEVELAND (AP) -- An appeals court ruling against a police search could give a drug suspect a chance to escape a life prison term. Prosecutors on Monday awaited a decision on whether to appeal the ruling that would allow Walter Lewis, 32, of Cleveland, to get a new trial without facing as evidence the discovery of crack cocaine worth more than $100,000. Lewis was arrested in 1996 and, as a three-time offender, got a mandatory life sentence on a federal drug conviction after 1 pound of cocaine was found in his bedroom. But the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati ruled 2-1 that the house search that led to Lewis' arrest was improper and threw out his conviction. The U.S. solicitor general will decide whether to appeal the Nov. 3 ruling to the full 6th Circuit court, Assistant U.S. Attorney William Edwards said Monday. Lewis' attorney, James Willis, called the case a victory against improper police searches. Assistant U.S. Attorney Christa Brunst said the search was legal. She said officers knocked on the door, were allowed inside and saw Lewis run up the stairs. Fearing that Lewis was going to destroy evidence or grab a gun, they chased him and found cocaine in open view, Brunst said. Officers went to the house after arresting two men, including Lewis' brother, on drug dealing charges down the street. Police were acting on a confidential tip. ``The informant indicated that there would be a drug transaction outside the house,'' Judge Boyce F. Martin said in the majority opinion. There was no indication that someone would be inside the house to destroy evidence, the ruling said. In a dissenting opinion, Justice Eugene Siler said police do not need a warrant to enter a home when they knock and are allowed entry. When the detectives saw Lewis run up the steps, they had reason to justify the search, Siler said. Family members disputed the police contention that relatives had allowed the officers to enter the home. They claimed officers threatened to tear up the house and board it up if they weren't allowed to search. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom