Pubdate: Tue, 28 Nov 2000
Source: USA Today (US)
Copyright: 2000 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc.
Contact:  1000 Wilson Blvd., Arlington VA 22229
Fax: (703) 247-3108
Website: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nfront.htm
Author: Joan Biskupic

COURT TACKLES MEDICINAL-POT CASE

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to decide whether people who provide 
marijuana to seriously ill people to ease their misery should be exempt 
from federal anti-drug laws. The court accepted a dispute from California, 
where voters in 1996 adopted a proposition allowing patients to grow and 
use marijuana for medical needs. Eight other states have similar laws. The 
case could affect patients' access to marijuana nationwide and steer debate 
over the benefits and harms of using the drug for pain relief and other 
treatment.

"For cancer patients, marijuana can relieve the nausea that accompanies 
chemotherapy," says Santa Clara University law professor Gerald Uelmen, 
representing a cannabis cooperative. "There's also evidence that marijuana 
stimulates the appetite and helps AIDS patients keep their weight up."

The Justice Department, which says medicinal-marijuana efforts conflict 
with U.S. controlled-substances laws, tried to block the activities of the 
Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative, which was set up to distribute the 
drug after California passed Proposition 215. The department won an 
injunction barring the co-op from selling marijuana, even to people whose 
doctors said that they would suffer imminent harm without it.

But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit reversed, saying there 
could be a common-law "medical necessity" defense to prosecution. The 
appeals court cited a "public interest in the availability of a 
doctor-prescribed treatment (to) relieve the pain and suffering of a large 
group of persons" with serious illnesses.

The 9th Circuit said the lower court judge -- who happens to be Charles 
Breyer, the brother of Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer -- should have 
considered the needs of patients who had no legal alternative to obtaining 
the drug. (Justice Stephen Breyer has recused himself from the case.)

The Justice Department says the 9th Circuit's action cannot be squared with 
a federal law that bans marijuana because of its potential for abuse. It 
adds that Congress opposes efforts to legalize marijuana without valid 
scientific evidence and approval by the Food and Drug Administration.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Terry Liittschwager