Pubdate: Tue, 28 Nov 2000
Source: State Journal-Register (IL)
Copyright: 2000 The State Journal-Register
Contact:  P.O. Box 219, Springfield, IL 62705-0219
Fax: (217) 788-1551
Website: http://www.sj-r.com/
Author: Laurie Asseo, The Associated Press

SUPREME COURT WILL RULE ON MEDICAL USE OF MARIJUANA

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court entered the debate over medical marijuana 
Monday, agreeing to decide whether the drug can be provided to patients out 
of "medical necessity" even though federal law makes its distribution a crime.

The justices said they will hear the Clinton administration's effort to bar 
a California group from providing the drug to seriously ill patients for 
pain and nausea relief.

A lower court decision allowing the Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative to 
distribute the drug "threatens the government's ability to enforce the 
federal drug laws," government lawyers said.

But the California group says that for some patients, marijuana is "the 
only medicine that has proven effective in relieving their conditions or 
symptoms."

The group's lawyer, Annette P. Carnegie, said Monday that the federal 
Controlled Substances Act does not prohibit the distribution of marijuana 
for medical reasons.

"Those choices, we believe, are best made by physicians and not by the 
government," she said. Marijuana is effective in relieving nausea in cancer 
patients undergoing chemotherapy, in controlling weight loss in 
HIV-positive patients and in reducing pain, she said.

Eight states besides California have medical-marijuana laws in place or 
approved by voters: Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Maine, Oregon, Washington, 
Nevada and Colorado. Residents of Washington, D.C., voted in 1998 to allow 
the medical use of marijuana, but Congress blocked the measure from 
becoming law.

Justice Department lawyers said Congress has decided that marijuana has "no 
currently accepted medical use."

In August, the Supreme Court barred the California organization from 
distributing marijuana while the government pursued its appeal.

Justice Stephen G. Breyer did not participate in the case. His brother, a 
federal trial judge in San Francisco, had barred distribution of marijuana 
only to have his decision reversed by a federal appeals court.

California's law, approved by the voters in 1996, authorizes the possession 
and use of marijuana for medical purposes upon a doctor's recommendation.

The Oakland group said its goal is "to provide seriously ill patients with 
safe access to necessary medicine so that these individuals do not have to 
resort to the streets."

But the federal Controlled Substances Act includes marijuana among the 
drugs whose manufacture and distribution are illegal.

In January 1998, the federal government filed a lawsuit against the Oakland 
club, asking a judge to ban it from providing marijuana.

Judge Charles Breyer issued a preliminary order imposing such a ban. But 
the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the order, saying the 
government did not disprove the club's evidence that the drug was "the only 
effective treatment for a large group of seriously ill individuals."

Last May, Breyer issued a new order allowing the Oakland group to provide 
marijuana to patients who needed it.

In the appeal granted Supreme Court review, Justice Department lawyers said 
the appeals court "seriously erred" in deciding the federal law allowed a 
medical-necessity defense.

The Oakland club's lawyers said "the voters of California have spoken" in 
approving the medical-marijuana measure.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Larry Stevens