Pubdate: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 Source: Washington Post (DC) Copyright: 2000 The Washington Post Company Contact: 1150 15th Street Northwest, Washington, DC 20071 Feedback: http://washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/edit/letters/letterform.htm Website: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ Author: Richard Cohen Related: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1769/a08.html ROBERT DOWNEY'S PROBLEM--AND OURS I hope that when Hollywood gets around to making "The Robert Downey Jr. Story," Downey gets to play himself. He is one of the few screen actors around who has the talent, not to mention the experience, to convince the American people that a drug addict is a sick person and not a criminal. But in the movie, as in life itself, Downey will be a jailbird. At least that's the way it now looks. Having been busted on drug charges last week, he was jailed overnight and is due back in court Dec. 27 for a hearing. The actor was allegedly found in a conked-out state, and police discovered cocaine and methamphetamines in his hotel room. He has been down this road before. It was only last August that Downey got out of Corcoran State Prison. He had served a bit more than a year of an original three-year sentence. Corcoran is where Charles Manson and Sirhan Sirhan, killers both, are held. It is hard, hard time. With Manson and Sirhan we can all name their victims. But who is Downey's? It has to be himself. He has committed no violent crime, robbed no bank nor, may I add, offered me a cell phone service that works only sporadically. The Palm Springs bust is illustrative. The Merv Griffin Resort Hotel and Givenchy Spa received no complaints and was blissfully unaware that in one of its rooms, a famous actor was determinedly sabotaging his career. Not so much as a towel was taken. To say that Downey has a problem is to understate matters by a considerable degree. He has lost his wife, his child and--it may turn out--his career. He has put a fortune up his nose and, like any addict, lied to friends and loved ones. His first allegiance, his only allegiance, is to his next fix. I pity the man. But I do not fear him. That is to say, I do not fear him any more than I do an alcoholic. I would not want either driving a car while zonked. But neither one is a criminal just on account of his addiction. If they steal to get drugs (or if they drive drunk), then they have committed a crime. Even then, though, what they need is treatment, not mere incarceration. Too often what they get is jail time. Downey's is the perfect face of the war on drugs. Just as his real victim is himself, so we have made war on ourselves. The lust for arrests has caused police agencies to throw the Constitution to the wind and, frequently, stop people on the probable cause of being black or Hispanic. On the New Jersey Turnpike, at least eight out of 10 searches made by state troopers were of minorities. Seventy percent of the time, they came up empty-handed, leaving a residue of bitterness and the rest of us no safer. Until a recent Supreme Court ruling, some police departments established roadblocks designed to catch people with drugs. Applying common sense, the court said that a sobriety checkpoint was designed to protect the public from drunk drivers, but possession of drugs was a different matter. That's a law enforcement issue and, as the Constitution requires, a warrant is necessary. Searching every other car is hardly what you would call "probable cause." Prisoners convicted of drug-related crimes clog the jails. As with stops on the Jersey Turnpike, the effect is racially disproportionate. Blacks make up about 12 percent of the population but account for 62 percent of drug offenders in state prisons. Altogether, federal prisons hold almost 240,000 persons convicted of drug--not violent--crimes, and the states hold about 200,000 more. This is an expensive proposition. There's some evidence that Americans are getting fed up with a hard-line approach to drugs. Voters in nine states have approved the use of marijuana for medical necessity--three just this year alone. In California, voters approved a referendum to have nonviolent drug offenders sentenced to treatment facilities rather than to jail. Downey, who has been in and out of treatment, is sad proof that it doesn't always work. Some problems defy neat solutions--alcoholism, for one. But the present policy does damage to the Constitution, makes criminals out of mere users, divides us along racial and ethnic lines and has not materially dented our drug problem when it comes to hard-core addicts. Downey himself ought to make the movie. His only problem would be the "pitch." It's hard to say whether our drug policy is a tragedy or a farce. - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D