Pubdate: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 Source: Baltimore Sun (MD) Copyright: 2000 The Baltimore Sun, a Times Mirror Newspaper. Contact: 501 N. Calvert Street P.0. Box 1377 Baltimore, MD 21278 Fax: (410) 315-8912 Website: http://www.sunspot.net/ Forum: http://www.sunspot.net/cgi-bin/ultbb/Ultimate.cgi?action=intro Author: Kathleen Kennedy Townsend (The author is Maryland's lieutenant governor and chair of the State Cabinet Council on Criminal and Juvenile Justice.) PROBATION REFORMS CUT DRUG ABUSE, IMPROVE PUBLIC SAFETY The Sun raised many important points in its assessment of probation in Maryland, and I am pleased that it recognizes the promise of Break the Cycle, our new approach to supervising drug-addicted offenders ("Crime and no punishment," editorial, Nov. 19 and "Lieutenant governor hijacks probation," editorial, Nov. 20). But I must contend with the underlying premise that these reforms fall short because they ask too much of parole and probation. On the contrary, they will succeed precisely because they expect more -- both of the agents and of the offenders whom they supervise. That is why we should continue to move forward to provide the strategy and the resources that agents need. Maryland's parole and probation system, along with our entire public safety strategy, is undergoing a major shift in direction. To be sure, there have been difficulties. But even in their infancy, the reforms are showing promising results. Last year, a University of Maryland study found a 53 percent reduction in drug use among about 11,800 offenders whose probation requirements included drug testing twice a week. A follow-up study of 1,500 Break the Cycle offenders found that re-arrests were 23 percent lower than in other offenders, resulting in less drug activity and fewer victims. Make no mistake: There is a lot of work to do. For years, the Department of Parole and Probation was the forgotten stepchild of law enforcement. During the 1980s, when the number of offenders under supervision nearly doubled, parole and probation agents rose only 2 percent. Understaffed and under-resourced agents were overwhelmed. Without resources or time to adequately supervise offenders, crime increased, court dockets swelled and prison populations soared. This reflected a national phenomenon, and few states have worked as aggressively as Maryland to fix it. Fundamental changes in parole and probation have enormous potential to reduce crime. Focusing on drug-addicted offenders is particularly promising. Offenders on parole or probation consume about half the cocaine and heroin used in our country. This population drives a major portion of crime, not just in a few jurisdictions but throughout the state. In addition to supporting the drug trade, addicted offenders commit robberies and burglaries to get money to support their drug habits. If we can end their addictions, Maryland's crime rate, which has fallen 19 percent since 1995 to its lowest level in 25 years, could drop even further. For that reason, the Glendening-Townsend administration has been moving to a new model of supervision for several years. When these comprehensive reforms -- of which the Break the Cycle model is one part -- are complete, parole and probation officers will be based not in a central office, but in the community, working closely with police, treatment and community residents to supervise offenders closely. Most agents will be deployed in neighborhoods and have an average of 50 offenders to supervise. Offenders with drug problems will be given treatment, tested frequently and sanctioned immediately for relapses - -- a model research has shown most effective in keeping them off drugs. There is steady -- if slow -- progress on the implementation issues about which The Sun has expressed concern. Delays in processing drug tests have been sharply reduced: Today, test results are turned around within 24 hours. Delivering swift and certain sanctions for failed drug tests remains a serious problem, but we are making progress. In December 1999, an abysmally low 3 percent of positive tests met with a sanction. In June 2000, 26 percent did. That represents progress, but it is still not good enough. Still more encouraging, an innovative pilot program in Hagerstown has achieved a 94 percent sanction rate. Under the leadership of Judith Sachwald, the new director of the Division of Parole and Probation, we intend to replicate the elements of that pilot program in other jurisdictions to raise the sanction rate throughout the state. Continued progress will take time and resources. It will not be easy. But that is to be expected with a pilot reform only 2 years old. Over the past several years, with the support of the General Assembly, our administration has made unprecedented investments in supervision and treatment. We've increased the number of parole agents by 12 percent, from 607 to 681. We've also made a record 20 percent increase in the department's budget, from $58.1 million to $69.8 million. To attract and retain quality agents, we have made dramatic increases in agent salaries; both the starting salaries and the maximum salaries for agents have been raised 18 percent in the past year. At the same time, we've increased state funding for drug treatment 56 percent this year. These measures are a down payment on the transformation of parole and probation. Once fully implemented, these reforms promise a significant reduction in our rates of crime, violence and drug abuse. But we should not be naive. No reform, however well designed or implemented, can eliminate crime from our streets. There will continue to be people with the will and means to do harm. Criminals will still find the cracks and shadows of our law enforcement system. But we can step up supervision and enforcement. We can make it harder for people to commit crimes, and when they commit them, we can make sure they are punished to the full extent of the law. - --- MAP posted-by: Josh Sutcliffe