Pubdate: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 Source: Gloucester Daily Times (MA) Copyright: 2000 Essex County Newspapers, Incorporated. Contact: http://www.gloucestertimes.com/ Author: Gail Mountain FACE THE FACTS ABOUT DRUG POLICIES Well, last week's paper was filled with fascinating drug news, all indicative of the fact that society simply does not understand addiction or what to do about it. Quite frankly, nothing we've done in the last 25 years seems to have put a dent in the number of addicts in the United States. And that's a fact we need to face. We also need to face the fact that we are terribly confused about what to do about it. Three recent articles in the Times make that crystal clear. In the year 2000, we don't even know what drugs are good for us and what drugs are bad for us, and government speaks out of both sides of its mouth when trying to decide which is which and then how to proceed from there. On Dec. 4, despite Gov. Paul Cellucci's veto of a proposal to instruct the Department of Public Health to open needle exchange programs in local communities without local approval, the department has targeted two North Shore cities as potential locations for programs. And Gloucester's one of them. It seems that Jean McGuire, director of the Department of Public Health's HIV/AIDS bureau, said the number of organizations that have agreed to participate shows that the attitudes may be changing about needle exchange programs. As a result, Gloucester is one of nine communities statewide to be granted $10,000 to launch a public relations campaign geared toward changing the minds of those who disagree. Aside from the fact that it's a tad suspect for the state to use tax dollars to change the opinion of the people, a reasonable response to McGuire would be: Who cares that the number of government agencies in favor of needle exchange programs has increased? Attaining government funding is a large part of their job, but the decision about how to apply that money should be made by the people who live and breathe the issue, not by administrators who think they know best. And obviously, the know-it-alls at the administrative level who support needle exchange programs have not been able to make their case. Furthermore, at the risk of belaboring the point, two people have died in Gloucester recently of heroin overdoses. A needle exchange program would have done nothing to save them, but $90,000 of public relations money added to the funding to set up needle exchange programs might have. Many needle exchange proponents have their hearts in the right place, but they don't get it. Only a comprehensive program with a drug-free goal can save lives. We should close our eyes and our ears to any commercials. Ironically, a Dec. 6 article announcing that "Some seek peace treaty in war on drugs" charges the same state Department of Public Health that wants to give needles to heroin addicts is holding up a 1996 law that allows sick people to use marijuana. It seems sick people can only use marijuana if they register to participate in a Department of Public Health research project that violates federal law. And what might the difference be between the two approaches? Perhaps it has to do with the fact that state agencies get the money in one case, but in the other case it's the pot growers who get the money. If there's another reason why the Department of Public Health would support needle exchange programs but not pot as medicine, I can't find it. And I've little patience for a government that OKs the depositing of medicinal poison into one's body to treat a deadly disease but refuses to OK a medicinal herb to relieve the effects of that poison. And last, but surely not least, a Dec. 7 article featured DARE officer Wellesley Eastman defending the anti-drug program he's operated for 10 years. Regardless of what ultimately happens to the DARE program, Eastman deserves the thanks of parents everywhere for a dedicated effort to prevent drug use by our children. Nonetheless, the numbers have shown that DARE doesn't work either. Quite frankly, nothing works but the drugs. In my lifetime, I've lived through the days when addiction wasn't a common word, when "if it feels good, do it" was the national mantra, when methadone maintenance was the miracle cure, when "just say no" was the real antidote, and when giving up and giving needles has become the answer. And all the while, a significant portion of Gloucester's community has consistently continued to die as the result of drug abuse. What we can't understand, and what we are so afraid to talk about, is the simple fact that drugs kill pain, and as long as they work, we will never stop the attempt of a human being in pain from trying to administer his or her own anesthesia. We need to accept the fact that drugs are popular because they work. Only then will we be able to move on to the creative thinking it will take to pick up the pieces once the inevitable kicks in, which is addiction, jail and/or the death for our children. - ---