Pubdate: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 Source: Summit Daily News (CO) Copyright: 2000 Summit Daily News Contact: http://www.summitdaily.com/ Author: Frank Smith, guest columnist & Pres. DPFCO A TRAGIC MILESTONE IN THE DRUG WAR Sometime this week, the first St. Valentine's Day week of the Third Millennium, the United States will pass a milestone: our criminal justice system will incarcerate its two-millionth prisoner. That's less than one per cent of our population, but it is the highest percentage of any "civilized" nation, and it is growing at the fastest rate, doubling every decade. New prisons are under construction all over the country, and many states are farming out their prisoners to other states and to private corporations. Robbers and rapists are released to make room for non-violent offenders who have been given sentences without possibility of parole. One-third of all inmates today are in prison for non-violent offenses! How can this be? In 1970 the United States faced a drug crisis, largely brought on by the Viet Nam war. Veterans, protesters and disaffected young people all found a measure of comfort in psychoactive substances, and newly popular rock music glorified their use. In this atmosphere Congress passed the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention Act, and President Richard Nixon signed it -- one of several of his actions that in retrospect seems misguided. That was the beginning of the War on Drugs, which has resulted in the prison explosion described above. In 1970 the prison population was 200,000 -- now it is ten times greater. The act was well-intentioned, of course, but it contained a fatal flaw, a false statement that has caused a disaster. To simplify a long and complicated story, it classified marijuana with heroin and LSD as a Schedule I substance, the most dangerous category, not permitted to be used in medical practice or for any other purpose -- although marijuana has been used as medicine for thousands of years. It also exempted tobacco (nicotine) and liquor (alcohol) from the act, although they are clearly psychoactive drugs. Why did Congress do this? The liquor, tobacco, and pharmaceutical industries persuaded Congress that they were already adequately regulated by the Food and Drug Administration, and they believed that they would suffer competitively if marijuana were legal, controlled and taxed like alcohol and tobacco. So marijuana, a much less dangerous substance than alcohol or tobacco, has been illegal ever since and 800,000 non-violent inmates are now in prison for using it, at an average cost to taxpayers of $20,000 per year each -- that's $16 billion. (One woman in Arizona is physically handicapped; her incarceration will cost $126,000 this year. She sold four grams of marijuana to a police informant for $20.) That's why I call it the War Between Drugs -- alcohol and tobacco against marijuana. Think of the taxes the government could collect on marijuana if it were legal, instead of the billions they spend trying to keep people from enjoying it or using it to treat nausea, spasms, and glaucoma. Incidentally, the only reason that marijuana is a "gateway" or "steppingstone" drug is that it is illegal, so you have to get it from a pusher who would rather sell you cocaine or heroin. If it were legal and available (with an I.D.) at your local liquor store, it would be no more of a "gateway" than beer or cigarettes. Two other aspects of marijuana prohibition should be mentioned. In the name of drug law enforcement Congress has violated at least four provisions of the Constitution: freedom of speech, freedom from search and seizure, and states' rights. Random drug testing of employees and students is also becoming more widespread, although it has been shown to be counterproductive and a huge waste of money as well as an invasion of privacy. The other aspect is the prohibition of hemp, the plant on which marijuana grows, which is the strongest natural fiber and the raw material for high-quality paper fabric, rope, food and birdseed. Hemp grows wild throughout the United States and requires neither fertilizer nor pesticides. (This does not help its popularity with fertilizer and pesticide manufacturers, who also have powerful lobbies in Washington.) The U.S.A. is the only industrialized country that forbids hemp culture; we import ours from Canada, when the Office of National Drug Control Policy permits. They recently declared a total ban on hemp, even sterilized seeds, and almost put the Boulder Hemp Company out of business. Yes, right down the road from Summit County -- just call them for details. (Or call DPFCO.) Coloradans will vote on medical marijuana in November. Seven states have already approved it, by popular vote -- but their elected representatives in Congress don't support it, because of the above-mentioned lobbies. Governor Gary Johnson of New Mexico is the highest-ranking elected official to support it. George Shultz, William Buckley, Hugh Downs, and Steven Jay Gould are among its supporters. The late famous astrophysicist Carl Sagan used it on a daily basis and said it gave him insights he would never have had without it. And needless to say, it has been used by great musicians for most of the past century. In conclusion, the most significant statistic of all: Alcohol kills 100,000 people every year; tobacco is responsible for 400,000 deaths annually; marijuana has never been responsible for the death of a single person. No wonder the alcohol and tobacco industries don't want it legalized! I'm out of space, so please click on the Drug Policy Forum of Colorado Website at www.drugsense.org/dpfco or e-mail for further information. - --- MAP posted-by: Derek Rea