Pubdate: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 Source: New Haven Advocate (CT) Copyright: 2000 New Mass Media, Inc. Contact: http://www.newhavenadvocate.com/ Author: Camille Jackson BUSTED! In contrast to his shock of silver hair, David X. Sullivan's face looked even redder. No surprise, considering it was his first debate. As a self-proclaimed "fed," an assistant U.S. Attorney in New Haven, he had a lot of explaining to do during a recent panel debate sponsored by the Connecticut Civil Liberties Union. The subject was civil asset forfeiture, a legal maneuver that allows law enforcement to seize someone's car, house, land or even cash on suspicion that the property is drug-related. Officials can charge the property with a crime without ever needing probable cause to charge its owner. The owner then has to hire a lawyer, post 10 percent of the property's value and sue to get it back. Panelists at the Feb. 23 Yale Political Union debate clashed over pending legislation to reform current laws, making civil asset forfeiture harder to use. Proponents of reform blew hole after hole through Sullivan's arguments. Among other things, they said civil forfeiture contributes to racial profiling, gives police an incentive to seize expensive stuff (which the cops get to keep) and requires the property's owner to prove innocence, rather than the government to prove guilt. In his opening statements, Graham Boyd of the American Civil Liberties Union described civil asset forfeiture as a "confluence of racism, greed and corruption." A line gradually formed behind the audience microphone as Sullivan and fellow fed Mark Kaczynski, of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency's Hartford office, tried to defend their position. Forfeiture is a powerful tool against drug lords, with "minuscule" corruption, Kaczynski said. He believes more forfeitures would make the program better. "What if you seized all the drug property in the state?" asked Jerry Ravard of Stratford. After a few seconds of silence, Sullivan asked: "All of it?" Then he acknowledged that new drug dealers would move in, perpetuating the cycle. "Then why are you doing it?" quipped High Times photographer Preston Peet. Sullivan's face said it all: Busted! - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D