Pubdate: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 Source: Chicago Tribune (IL) Copyright: 2000 Chicago Tribune Company Contact: 435 N. Michigan Ave., Chicago, IL 60611-4066 Website: http://www.chicagotribune.com/ Forum: http://www.chicagotribune.com/interact/boards/ ARE WE FOOLS RUSHING INTO COLOMBIA? The Clinton White House and the Republican leadership in Congress seem hellbent on opening up the American money spigot full wide to help the Colombian government fight narcotraffickers--and presumably reduce the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. President Clinton's $1.6 billion aid package was easily endorsed Thursday by Republicans on the House Appropriations Committee, who larded $117 million more to fight drugs in Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador. Except for tough-on-drugs, election-year posturing, there is no justification for this sudden and massive escalation of U.S. involvement in Colombia--or even a clear strategy for how the money will be used. This policy threatens to entangle the U.S. in a decades-old foreign guerrilla war while doing nothing to dampen the engine that ultimately drives narcotrafficking: America's roughly $50 billion-a-year appetite for illicit drugs. Any wider American involvement in Colombia deserves a full congressional debate, both on the wisdom of the aid package and on whether that money could be more effectively used in some other way, like combating drug addiction in the U.S. The latest warning against deeper U.S. involvement comes from a powerful report by Human Rights Watch that documents extensive links between the Colombian army and paramilitary groups accused of atrocities. Colombia's conflict is not a neat duel between the government and one opposing group. It is instead a mayhem involving two guerrilla fronts, numerous drug cartels, and the government's army and drug police, in addition to several independent paramilitary units that roam the countryside like death squads for hire. Of all the actors in this tragedy, the last are the bloodiest. According to another report, just since the beginning of this year paramilitary squads have been responsible for most of 39 massacres that left 271 people dead. The Human Rights Watch investigation establishes their links with several army units, which use paramilitaries to do the dirty anti-insurgency work of terrorizing suspected guerrillas and their sympathizers. In the past few years the several army generals suspected of involvement with paramilitary units have been fired, but otherwise the government rejected the Human Rights Watch report. It would be repugnant to funnel American aid to a foreign army with such bloody credentials. At a bare minimum, any additional U.S. aid should be conditioned on the Colombian armed forces severing any ties with the paramilitary units and aggressively moving to defang and eliminate them. Far better than that, Congress and the Clinton administration ought to reconsider the upside-down priorities of this country's war on drugs. The additional billions poured into foreign interdiction ought to be used fighting the enemy within--drug addiction--by funding additional treatment and education programs to reduce demand right here at home. - --- MAP posted-by: Allan Wilkinson