Pubdate: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 Source: Miami Herald (FL) Copyright: 2000 The Miami Herald Contact: One Herald Plaza, Miami FL 33132-1693 Fax: (305) 376-8950 Website: http://www.herald.com/ Forum: http://krwebx.infi.net/webxmulti/cgi-bin/WebX?mherald Author: Glenn Garvin U.S. DRUG WAR FINDING ALLIES IN FORMERLY HOSTILE REGION (MANAGUA) -- When officials here announced last week that they hope to sign a treaty within the next few months giving U.S. military ships the right to pursue suspected narcotics traffickers into Nicaraguan coastal waters, the surprise was the reaction: Instead of the usual cries of American intervention, there was dead quiet. "Things have changed," said Oliver Garza, U.S. ambassador to Nicaragua, who made a maritime treaty on narcotics enforcement a top priority when he arrived here last September. "People have recognized that an international counternarcotics effort is not only not bad, it's actually good politics." In a startling turnaround, cooperation with the U.S. military against drug trafficking, which just a few years ago was political poison in Central America, has become politically profitable. The change is visible all around Central America: Costa Rica, which prides itself on rejecting just about anything with even the remotest military connection, approved what U.S. diplomats consider a model treaty that permits not only hot pursuit of suspected drug smugglers into territorial waters but counternarcotics flights through Costa Rican airspace. "Our national sovereignty is being violated daily by drug dealers, and all we have to combat it are the equivalent of paddleboats," said Vanessa Castro, a congresswoman from the normally anti-military Liberation party. Honduras -- where relations with the United States have been so prickly in recent years that President Carlos Flores went on television to denounce American aid efforts after Hurricane Mitch -- is within weeks of signing a similar maritime agreement with Washington. El Salvador's national police chief, Mauricio Sandoval, announced last week that the country was beginning air and sea patrols aimed at catching cocaine-laden ships that slip northward up the country's Pacific coast. But Sandoval bluntly said his forces were only a stopgap measure and that what El Salvador really needs is a treaty that will permit U.S. vessels to work Salvadoran waters. Guatemala, working with U.S. law enforcement agencies, last year seized 2.6 metric tons of cocaine being trucked up the Pan American Highway in shipping containers, the largest single bust on land in Central American history. El Salvador and Honduras have indicated interest in permitting one of their airfields to be used for U.S. military aircraft monitoring suspected drug flights from Latin America -- something that Panama refused to do last year when it closed down Howard Air Force Base as part of the Panama Canal turnover. Until recently, close cooperation with U.S. counternarcotics efforts was nearly impossible in Central America. The faintest whiff of it brought stormy protests that governments were abandoning their sovereignty -- and, moreover, doing so to combat something that was a problem for gringos and not Central Americans. The change is particularly noticeable in Nicaragua. After the announcement of the proposed treaty on hot pursuit of drug smugglers by U.S. military ships, the Nicaraguan army, which only a decade ago was virtually at war with the United States, announced it was inviting a delegation from the U.S. Southern Command to inspect the country. Nationalist Limits Last month, at a regional conference on combating narcotics trafficking, the president of El Salvador's congress warned his colleagues that nationalism had to be put aside if the Central American countries hoped to fight drugs. "To make a common front under a treaty is a matter of conscience," said Juan Carlos Deuch, "of accepting certain limitations on the natural rights of every country on things like sovereignty, joint patrols and extradition treaties." The other delegates applauded him. The change couldn't come at a more welcome time for the United States. With stepped-up enforcement efforts making the traditional Caribbean smuggling routes more difficult, traffickers are increasingly turning to Central America to move their product north. About 60 percent of the cocaine leaving South America for the United States travels through Central America, U.S. law enforcement authorities say, because the governments leave their coastlines almost unguarded, air coverage is spotty, and highway border crossings are undermanned. The Easiest Path The result was inevitable. "Narcotraffickers take the path of least resistance," said a DEA agent who has worked in Central America for several years. "And here, there was almost no resistance." But that's changing. One important factor is that the smuggling is no longer perceived as strictly a "gringo problem," because some of the drugs are staying behind. Cocaine use is up sharply throughout Central America. Another reason involves money: Central American armed forces, who once jealously guarded their prerogatives when it came to a foreign presence on their territory, have become enthusiastic boosters of treaties with the United States. Their eyes nearly popped out over the $1.6 billion U.S. military aid package proposed for Colombia. "We think it's a good idea if the U.S. Army, the DEA, the FBI and some others come to see what we're doing, the difficulties we have in some places here," Nicaraguan Defense Minister Jose Antonio Alvarado said, "so we can all get together and determine how they can help us strengthen our strategic capacity for joint operations." Old Quarrels Fading More broadly, bruised feelings from the 1980s seem to be healing. Central America's political left bitterly resented U.S. intervention in the region during that era, and even the political right, which backed American military assistance, bridled at the strings that were attached. Even though the old quarrels seem to be fading, diplomats on both sides warn that the new spirit of cooperation could easily be shattered if Washington pushes too far too fast. The U.S. ambassadors in Honduras and Nicaragua were appalled last year to discover that the State Department was about to put the two countries on its annual list of "major drug producing and drug transit" countries. Many U.S. diplomats say including Honduras and Nicaragua would have been disastrously confrontational at a time when the two countries were warming up to American overtures. "It took a lot of lobbying by the [U.S.] ambassadors to get Nicaragua and Honduras off that list," said an American diplomat who followed the controversy closely. "They really had to argue, `We don't want drugs to become the focal points of our relations here. These countries are not Colombia.' Fortunately, it worked." - --- MAP posted-by: manemez j lovitto