Pubdate: Wed, 22 Mar 2000
Pubdate: Wed, 22 Mar 2000
Source: The Enterprise-Journal (MS)
Copyright: 2000 The Enterprise-Journal
Contact:  P.O. Box 910, McComb, MS 39649
Website: http://www.enterprise-journal.com/NF/omf/ejournal/index.html
Author: Charley Reese

PRESENT WAR ON DRUGS A FAILURE, NEW TACTICS ARE NEEDED

Suppose your son or daughter became addicted to crack cocaine. Suppose he 
or she committed some nonviolent crime to support the habit. Suppose he or 
she was arrested.

At this point, you might suppose that the police would notify you. It 
doesn't always happen that way. Sometimes cops, using prison sentences as a 
threat, will force a nonviolent first offender to become a confidential 
informant.

In one case, a 19-year-old girl was wired, given $85 to buy crack and 
instructed to go to a crack house and smoke dope with a man the cops 
suspected of murder and try to get him to talk about it. She failed, and 
the cops charged her with the original offense.

Her father, one of those World War II veterans not so easily intimidated by 
bureaucrats and politicians, was outraged. "Just what was Plan B?" he 
inquired of the cops. "What would you have done if this guy had discovered 
the wire and killed my daughter? I'll tell you what you would have done. 
You would have called her mother and me, and you would have said you found 
our daughter's body and it appears to be drug-related. And you would never 
have admitted her murder was your fault."

Outrage has led to a crusade to persuade the Florida Legislature to pass a 
law that would prohibit police officers from using addicts who are 
first-time, nonviolent offenders as confidential informants. The father 
also wants a law that would send first-time, nonviolent offenders who are 
addicts or mentally ill into a treatment program rather than a prison.

Harold P. Koenig's logic is irrefutable. But logic and common sense don't 
always work in politics. Law-enforcement types are opposed to his sensible 
ideas, but they are wrong, and he is right.

This so-called war on drugs, now more than 40 years and uncounted billions 
of dollars old, is a flat failure. There are more drugs available now than 
there were before. And, as everyone knows, the only answer is to cut the 
demand. You do that by treating addicts, not stacking them up in prisons.

Addiction to a chemical substance is an illness. Mental illness is a 
medical problem, not a law-enforcement problem. Koenig, though well past 
retirement age, went unarmed to several drug dealers in his county and 
asked them, "Who are your customers?" He got virtually the same reply from 
all of them. Seventy-five percent are addicts released from prison or jail; 
15 percent are addicts who haven't yet been caught.

"So there is 90 percent of their market, and if, by mandatory treatment, 
you could cure 75 percent, you'd put these guys out of business," Koenig 
said. "That's a much better approach than interdicting supply, which is an 
obvious failure."

Koenig is going to need a lot of help if he is going to overcome the 
resistance of the law-enforcement bureaucracy, which gets millions of 
dollars to "fight the war on drugs." But his approach makes sense. Doing 
the same old, same old does not.

Koenig has formed an organization he calls H.E.A.R.T. — Help Early Addicts 
Receive Treatment. You can contact him at 341 Lanternback Island Drive, 
Satellite Beach, FL 32937. The phone number is (321) 773-0298.

Don't be misled: Koenig hates drugs and drugs dealers. He just has sense 
enough to realize that treating the addicts is a better way to put them out 
of business.

As for forbidding cops from using nonviolent first offenders as undercover 
informants, common decency demands that. It's one thing to force a career 
criminal to be an informant. It's quite another to put a sick, and often 
naive, young person into a position of danger.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Richard Lake