Pubdate: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 Source: New York Sunday Times Magazine (NY) Copyright: 2000 The New York Times Company Contact: 229 West 43rd Street, New York, NY 10036 Fax: (212) 556-3622 Website: http://www.nytimes.com/ Forum: http://www10.nytimes.com/comment/ Column: WORD & IMAGE By Max Frankel Author: Max Frankel THE CALL OF THE ANDES The Escalating War Abroad Will Only Divert Attention From The Question At Home: Are Attacks On The Supply Of Drugs More Effective Than Major Efforts To Reduce Demand? A new media-op in the perpetual drug war. This is a media alert for editors and television producers who thought they could safely ignore all news outside the United States: the permanent drug war is going military -- and abroad. The White House and Congress, having failed with massive domestic police actions to reduce the quantity or quality of illegal drugs on our streets, are mounting a major pursuit of coca growers in Colombia. Lay news junkies may also be interested, but they can take their time; this story promises to be around for years. Alert media, however, will want to prepare to field Spanish-speaking correspondents, duly covered by kidnap insurance, to follow the action across the photogenic terrain of the Andes. It would be unwise to expect trustworthy information from Washington, where success in this war is still defined by the bag count -- the amount of cocaine captured or the number of coca plants destroyed. The experience of decades proves that any such good result in one venue merely pushes the farming, processing or trafficking of drugs to another. Indeed, it was the great assault on coca plantations in Peru and Bolivia a decade ago that led to the cultivation of even richer strains in Colombia. That country, two and a half times the size of France, now supplies 80 percent of the cocaine consumed in the United States and equal amounts for the rest of the world. Nor can much reliable information be expected from Colombian journalists. Though intrepid, they are the targets of murderous assaults by the competing factions of Colombia's drug-fueled civil war. In the past six months, five reporters have been killed and scores threatened, kidnapped or forced into exile. The newest refugee is Francisco Santos, the news editor of El Tiempo, the country's leading paper, who left in despair last month before a credible death threat could be carried out. The terrorism of left- and right-wing guerrillas -- and the efforts of the army and the police to pursue them -- have resulted in the deaths of thousands of Colombians each year. All the paramilitary gangs are well armed; some tax the coca growers whom they protect, others profit from kidnappings and extortions. The turf battles in coca regions caused 350,000 people to abandon their homes last year. The violence and Colombia's bitter economic depression combined to cause another 350,000 to leave the country altogether. Gen. Barry R. McCaffrey, the White House drug commander, says the explosion in Colombia's cocaine production is "clearly a huge drug emergency." But Congress has taken its time acting on a $1.3 billion aid package, which will send the drug hunters 60 helicopters, assorted weapons and several hundred American military instructors. A major cause of delay was the need to apportion the aid among rival units of the Colombian Army and national police. Another was the search for a compromise between lobbyists for two helicopters -- the Sikorsky UH-60L Blackhawk, made by United Technologies in Connecticut, and the cheaper but slower Huey, made by Textron's Bell division in Texas. As Tim Golden reported in The Times last month, both companies began as far back as 1996 to demonstrate their alarm about developments in Colombia and their readiness to contribute to the drug war there and to political campaigns at home. A further delay, after the House finally acted, was prompted by Senate leaders who thought the aid was attached to too many pork barrel projects. In the meantime, Roberto Suro learned for The Washington Post that coca production was resurgent in Peru because of the loss of American radar flights in the Andes region. Our base for reconnaissance planes in Panama was closed. A substitute field in Ecuador can operate only in daytime. Even if that field was refurbished with money in the pending aid package, all of the Air Force's big Awacs radar planes have now been irretrievably committed to surveillance over Kosovo, North Korea and Iraq. The confusion at the American end of the war is more than matched by that in Colombia. President Andrés Pastrana has promised to wage a vigorous campaign against the drug lords, but some of his closest political associates (as well as their top American military adviser) have been enveloped by scandal. Pastrana still trusts the Colombian Army, but many of its units have been accused of complicity in human rights violations. A further complication is the fact that President Pastrana has begun peace talks with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (F.A.R.C.), the country's largest leftist insurgent force and the protector of many drug growers. Those negotiations have further inflamed a rival, right-wing guerrilla group that the State Department has called a bunch of murderous thugs. There is little chance of waging the drug war in Colombia without also becoming involved in a multilayered civil war. Moreover, unless peace is achieved soon, the American aid seems destined to provoke an arms race. As Gen. Fred F. Woerner, the former commander of our forces in Latin America, has said: "What you can absolutely count on is that with the Blackhawks or the beefed-up Hueys, the bad guys are going to acquire surface-to-air missiles. Helicopters will be shot down. The question is, will we replace them?" It is but one question among many. The pending aid package is for two years, the time needed to deliver all the helicopters. But General McCaffrey has told Congress to expect at least a five-year effort in Colombia. Others warn that an effective campaign will simply push the coca planting back into Peru or into neighboring regions of Venezuela and Brazil. And alas, the escalating war abroad will only divert attention from the ultimate policy question at home: are attacks on the supply of drugs really more effective than major efforts to reduce demand? The cost of federal anti-drug programs during the Clinton years has doubled to nearly $20 billion, but only one-fifth of that goes for treating addicts. States and cities have spent vastly greater sums and filled their prisons with 400,000 violators of drug laws. But that has had no apparent effect on street supplies. Concerned media could dig into that conundrum without even worrying about kidnap insurance. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake