Pubdate: Tue, 02 May 2000
Source: Los Angeles Times (CA)
Copyright: 2000 Los Angeles Times
Contact:  Times Mirror Square, Los Angeles, CA 90053
Fax: (213) 237-4712
Website: http://www.latimes.com/
Forum: http://www.latimes.com/home/discuss/
Author: James Gerstenzang, Times Staff Writer
Note: Times staff writer Matea Gold in Los Angeles contributed to this story.

GORE STEERS TO THE CENTER WITH ANTI-CRIME PROPOSALS

*Politics: Vice president will unveil plan to meld law enforcement, drug 
and gang programs and victims' rights.

Program would cost $1.3 billion a year.

WASHINGTON--Moving to delineate differences with George W. Bush while 
setting himself apart from "the old Democratic approach," Al Gore plans to 
outline an anti-crime program today that melds stepped up law enforcement, 
drug and gang programs and victims' rights measures.

The vice president will propose a federal program that would spend $500 
million a year--with the states matching the money--to fight the use of 
drugs in state and local prisons.

It would expand drug-rehabilitation programs within the institutions, keep 
prisoners behind bars if they are still using drugs when their sentences 
end, and return to prison parolees who fail periodic drug tests.

This "stay-out, stay-clean" form of enforced abstinence was presented as 
the centerpiece of Gore's program by a Clinton administration official 
familiar with the vice president's plans.

Gore, in a speech at a YMCA in Atlanta, will also call for federal funding 
to put an additional 50,000 police officers on American streets, continuing 
a program already favored by the administration.

In excerpts of his text provided to The Times, Gore pledges to "intensify 
the battle against crime, drugs and disorder in our communities."

He says he would launch "a sweeping anti-crime strategy" that would neither 
"surrender to the right-wing Republicans who threaten funding for new 
police and tried to gut crime prevention," nor return "to the old 
Democratic approach, which was tough on the causes of crime but not tough 
enough on crime itself."

"I will reform a justice system that spills half a million prisoners onto 
our streets each year, many of them addicted to drugs, unrehabilitated and 
just waiting to commit another crime," he says. "I will put the rights of 
victims and families first again and I will push for more crime prevention 
to stop the next generation of crime before it's too late.

"I believe we should make prisoners a simple deal: Before you get out of 
jail, you have to get clean, and if you want to stay out, then you'd better 
stay clean," he says.

The effort to restrict drug use in prisons and among parolees represents 
both the greatest departure from current policy and a new campaign directed 
at the heart of the nation's drug problem.

According to an administration official familiar with Gore's plan, 50% of 
the users of heroin and cocaine in the United States are within the 
jurisdiction of its justice system, either as prisoners or parolees.

Other than the prison drug policy, Gore's speech covers issues that largely 
have been suggested by the administration before.

Overall, Gore would spend approximately $1.3 billion on the anti-crime 
programs, a modest increase over current spending.

The administration sought that same amount for anti-crime programs last 
year and was granted slightly less than $1 billion by Congress.

Among other elements in the program, Gore, the presumptive Democratic 
presidential nominee, will seek renewal of an expired 1994 program that 
locked in funding for programs combating violent crime and would provide 
federal assistance for the establishment of gang-free zones.

These would be created under federal court injunctions banning the wearing 
of gang-related clothing in specific areas and imposing curfews on gang 
members there.

Overall, even as the crime rate continues to drop, the Gore measures would 
push the federal government further into an area that has traditionally 
belonged to state and local authorities.

"Al Gore believes that in an era where gangs and crime have no boundaries, 
the local sheriff shouldn't have to fight the battle alone, and the federal 
government has a responsibility to give state and local law enforcement 
more tools," said an administration official who spoke on condition of 
anonymity.

The vice president will also offer support for a constitutional amendment 
that would give crime victims greater rights within the criminal justice 
system.

In his speech, Gore outlines philosophical differences with Bush on 
crime-control measures, chastising Bush for what he says is an approach 
that would lessen the federal role and, in the words of an administration 
official, keep "the revolving door of drugs and crime going by failing to 
make sure that criminals first get clean before they get out of jail."

Responding to Gore's plan, the Republican campaign argued that Bush, as 
governor of Texas, has shown innovations in fighting drug use in prisons, 
while the number of beds in federal prisons available for drug treatment 
has dropped by one-third during the Clinton administration.

"The vice president's newfound enthusiasm as being a crime fighter 
underscores why he has a problem with credibility," said Bush spokesman Dan 
Bartlett. "His record on crime doesn't match his rhetoric."

He pointed out that the vice president is making the speech--on his 
schedule for several days--at a time when a CNN poll found "the American 
people favor Bush by 20% on the issue of who would best handle the issue of 
crime."

Overall, that poll gave Bush a 49% to 44% lead over Gore, within its 
5-percentage-point margin of error.

Gore's speech is one in a series the vice president is giving over a period 
of several weeks intended to draw a distinction with the Texas governor as 
Bush, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, moves to present 
himself as a candidate comfortable with the centrist domestic policies of 
mainstream America.

Among a number of criminal justice experts, the key to keeping former 
inmates off drugs is treatment and rehabilitation of addicts while in prison.

"You're going to have to do something on the front end," said Anthony 
Borbon, associate director of the Violence Prevention Coalition of Greater 
Los Angeles, run by the county's Department of Health Services. "You're 
kind of putting the flagpole up too late if you wait until they're up for 
parole" to test inmates.

The proposals to toughen federal anti-gang laws were met with skepticism 
among some juvenile justice advocates, who said more attention needs to be 
paid to the sources of gang violence.

"Everyone wants to take a swing at gangs and crime," said David Steinhart, 
director of Commonweal, a juvenile justice reform program. "Most of [the 
ideas] are politically inspired.

Every politician has to be tougher than the last guy.

"When you want to get at the root of gang problems, you have to clean up 
the world gangs come from. That means early intervention and prevention."

The effort to restrict drug use in prisons and among parolees represents 
both the greatest departure from current policy and a new campaign directed 
at the heart of the nation's drug problem.

According to an administration official, 50% of the users of heroin and 
cocaine in the United States are within the jurisdiction of its justice 
system, either as prisoners or parolees.

The focus on drug treatment in prison is crucial, Gore says, because "when 
inmates are sent back onto the streets unrehabilitated, unrepentant and 
unskilled, then they're just going to commit more crime and go right back 
to prison.

We have to stop that revolving door once and for all."
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jo-D