Pubdate: Tue, 23 May 2000 Source: Chronicle of Higher Education, The (US) Copyright: 2000 by The Chronicle of Higher Education Contact: http://chronicle.com Author: Stephen Burd HOUSE REPUBLICANS AIM TO HELP EDUCATION DEPT. ENFORCE LAW DENYING AID TO STUDENTS WITH DRUG CONVICTIONS Washington Because the Education Department has had so much trouble carrying out a law that denies federal student aid to people convicted of drug offenses, Republicans in the House of Representatives plan to introduce a bill this week to make the law easier to enforce. The legislation would narrow the scope of the law by stating that only students who are convicted while in college and receiving aid could lose their eligibility for the funds. Under the current law, which goes into effect in July, the Education Department can deny federal aid to students who at any time have been convicted in state or federal court for possessing or selling drugs. Many educators -- particularly at institutions that serve nontraditional students -- say that it makes no sense to deny aid to students who may have broken drug laws years ago and are now trying to make good lives for themselves. The bill would also add penalties for students who refuse to answer a question on their aid applications that asks if they have ever "been convicted of any illegal drug offense." Students who fail to respond on their applications would be denied aid until they submitted an answer to the department. Those provisions are part of a bill, which the House Committee on Education and the Workforce is expected to debate on Thursday, that would make technical changes in the 1998 Higher Education Act. In March, the Education Department acknowledged that more than 20 percent of students applying for financial aid -- or about 140,000 students -- had left the drug question blank on their aid applications. Worried that the processing of student aid could be seriously disrupted on campuses, the department allowed colleges to give money to those students. Instead of losing their aid, the students received notices warning them that they had to alert the department if they have ever had been convicted of a drug offense, or risk penalties for lying on their drug forms. (See a story from The Chronicle, March 10.) Rep. Mark Souder, the Indiana Republican who had introduced an amendment to the Higher Education Act in 1998 to block aid to those convicted of drug offenses, was not pleased with the department's actions, said Angela Flood, a spokeswoman for the Congressman. Mr. Souder persuaded his colleges on the House education committee to include the new proposals as part of the technical bill, she said, to make it easier for the department to carry out the law and to ensure that students were not evading the law by not responding to the question. "We had drafted the 1998 law broadly, so as to give the department flexibility in implementing the provisions," said Ms. Flood. "But we have decided that we needed to clarify our intent." College lobbyists are pleased that the new proposal would not apply to students who were convicted of a drug offense before entering college or who have not previously received financial aid. "I don't think the provision will jeopardize the aid of very many students," said Terry W. Hartle, senior vice president for government and public affairs at the American Council on Education, "because I don't believe that very many federal-aid recipients are convicted of drug offenses." Mr. Hartle said that the college lobbying groups would not oppose the provision denying aid to those who refuse to answer the drug question on their aid forms. "In general, we would prefer not to have the question asked at all," he said. "But if Congress is going to put the question on the form, it's reasonable to insist that the question be answered before aid is awarded." But some college aid administrators are worried about the burden of having to confront students who leave the question blank. At the University of Georgia, more than 30,000 students apply for aid each year. "Chasing these students down is going to mean a lot more work for us," said Susan D. Little, associate director for operations in the Office of Student Financial Aid. "And students who leave the question blank by mistake are going to face long delays in getting their aid." - --- MAP posted-by: Thunder