Pubdate: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 Source: Boston Globe (MA) Copyright: 2000 Globe Newspaper Company. Contact: P.O. Box 2378, Boston, MA 02107-2378 Feedback: http://extranet.globe.com/LettersEditor/default.asp Website: http://www.boston.com/globe/ Author: John Donnelly, Globe Staff COLOMBIA AID PACKAGE SET FOR OK Senate approval accepted for anti-narcotics measure WASHINGTON - After several months of delay, the Senate yesterday appeared headed toward approving a scaled-down $934 million version of the Clinton administration's drug-fighting package for Colombia, a vote that would ensure a major new US commitment in the Andean nation's long war. By an 89-11 vote, the Senate first rejected an amendment that would have taken $225 million earmarked for Colombia's military and put into US drug-treatment programs, setting the stage for final approval of the funds. A final vote is scheduled for today. Under the Senate's plan, the money for Colombia will buy transport helicopters, train Colombian military, provide regional assistance, and set up several human rights programs. White House aides have complained that the Senate's delay on Colombia has hurt drug-fighting initiatives there. Colombian President Andres Pastrana first requested the funds late last summer, and the Clinton administration proposed a $1.3 billion two-year package in January. The House approved a $1.7 billion plan. Once it clears the Senate, the measure would go to a conference committee. The funding for Colombia is part of the Senate's $13.4 billion foreign aid bill. Senate supporters said the funds should be released now to help preserve Colombia's democracy as well as stem the massive flow of cocaine and heroin to the United States. Colombia is the source of about 80 percent of America's cocaine and nearly all the heroin in certain US markets, including New England. `'This package may not be perfect, but our delay in responding to a neighbor's call for help is getting too long,'` said Senator Christopher J. Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat. `'Every day we wait, every day we delay, means more lives lost, means greater strength for these narco-traffickers.'` Senator Richard J. Durbin, an Illinois Republican, described how he flew with the Colombian military last weekend over coca fields in southern Colombia. `'You could see the plants in every direction, 600 square miles of coca plants,'` he said. Nearly all the plants, which are refined into cocaine, would soon be on their way to the United States. `'It will be sold right here,'` he said. `'The likelihood you will be robbed or murdered is usually connected to narcotics... The prisons in America are busting at the seams primarily because of narcotics.'` Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, a Mississippi Republican, who had earlier held up consideration of the package, called the funding package a `'close national security interest for our country.'` But Senator Paul Wellstone, a Minnesota Democrat who offered the amendment to shift funds into drug treatment, called it a `'scandal'` that the bulk of funding in the US war on drugs was not put toward helping addicts try to quit drugs. `'We have so much evidence that we can treat this addiction and make a huge difference,'` Wellstone said. `'Instead, we are trying to go the militarization route... What I am hearing in this debate is this is not really a question of a war on narcotics, this is a question of basically saying we've got to support the Colombian military.'` US and Colombian officials have said the military needs helicopters as well as specially trained batallions to help fight narco-traffickers in the 40 percent of the country that is not under government control. The US funding is directed almost solely at the guerrillas fighting the government, ignoring drug-cultivating areas in north Colombia controlled mainly by paramilitary forces. Several human rights reports in the last year have found extensive links between the military and paramilitary forces. By voice vote, the Senate yesterday passed an amendment by Senators Patrick J. Leahy, a Vermont Democrat, and Jeff Sessions, an Alabama Republican, that conditions payments under the plan on the Colombian government meeting certain human rights standards. The vote was watched closely by a large group of interested parties, from companies that make military helicopters to human rights groups. `'I think we are in for a very long war,'` said Sanho Tree, director of the drug policy project at the Institute for Policy Studies, a progressive think-tank. `'I don't know if we will know what victory looks like two, three years down the line. I don't know if we will recognize defeat either.' - --- MAP posted-by: Don Beck