Pubdate: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 Source: Connecticut Post (CT) Copyright: 2000sConnecticut Post Contact: 410 State St., Bridgeport, CT 06604 Website: http://www.ctpost.com/ Author: Jerry Rivard Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n806/a06.html, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n794/a01.html, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n794/a02.html, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n806/a05.html, http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n793/a06.html AMERICA ADDICTED TO A FAILED POLICY ON DRUGS Thank you for publishing the stories on heroin addiction in the June 11 & 12 issues of the Connecticut Post. Drug policy is one of the most important and misunderstood issues of our time, and your well-researched articles have shed some light on one of its most significant aspects - the fact that heroin addicts are not 'dope fiends' but people who need help. A special thanks Maria Melendez and others who are out there on the streets every day, trying to help one human being at a time. It is a common belief that because drugs themselves are such a destructive force in our society, any measures we might take to combat them are sensible and justified. We forget that the War On Drugs is a War On People who use them, and we fail to question whether we might be making the problem worse. It is easy to see the destruction that drugs can cause, but not so easy to separate the consequences of drugs from the consequences of prohibition. The basic strategy behind our drug policy is to make drugs more dangerous, expensive, and inconvenient in order to discourage their use. Every individual act of drug use is made more dangerous by prohibition, both deliberately and inadvertently. But as your stories clearly showed, heroin is devastating enough on its own, without any help from us. We deliberately strive to raise the street price of heroin, in the hope that the more it costs, the fewer people will buy it. As a result, those who become addicted must pay exorbitant prices, for which many resort to crime; and drug dealers can make enough profits to buy big guns and shoot each other over territory, with innocent victims sometimes caught in the crossfire. Yet we justify continued prohibition by declaring that heroin addicts commit crimes to support their habits and that drug trafficking causes violence, ignoring the fact that these effects are created or exacerbated by prohibition. We deliberately strive to reduce the purity of street heroin, in the hope that drugs of lesser purity will be less addictive and impairing. As a result, street heroin is cut with unknown quantities of unknown substances, resulting in an increased likelihood of poisoning and accidental overdose. Yet we justify continued prohibition by declaring that drugs are unsafe, ignoring the fact that they are made more dangerous when smuggled in swallowed condoms, defecated, and mixed with God knows what. But with the prices coming down, the purity rising, and the number of heroin users at 2.3 million, how can we not question the effectiveness of our strategy? Yet we justify escalated prohibition by declaring that stronger measures will meet our goals, ignoring the fact that so far, they haven't. Obviously, heroin is a terrible drug, and we should do whatever we can to dissuade our citizens from ever trying it. Send former heroin addicts with their own personal horror stories into the schools to talk to kids. Tell our children the truth about drugs, don't pretend that marijuana is just as bad as cocaine, or that cocaine is just as bad as heroin. The truth about heroin speaks for itself, and it says "Bad Choice." But for those addicted to heroin, our current policy makes its devastation so much worse with dangerous associations, inflated prices, and unpredictable purity. And several of the addicts in your stories sought treatment, only to be turned away for lack of space; while our federal drug control budget includes twice as much for law enforcement as it does for treatment. Addiction has been described as the continuation of a behavior despite its damaging consequences. Will we ever break the cycle of addiction to a clearly failed policy? - --- MAP posted-by: greg