Pubdate: Sun, 09 Jul 2000
Source: Idaho State Journal (ID)
Copyright: 2000 Idaho State Journal
Contact:  PO Box 431, Pocatello ID 83204
Fax: 208-233-8007
Website: http://www.journalnet.com/

DRUG COURT, TREATMENT CENTER ARE A GOOD SOLUTION

A "drug court" proposed by 6th District Judge Randy Smith and supported by 
Bannock County Prosecutor Mark Hiedeman, Public Defender Randy Schulthies 
and probation officers is an innovative way to tackle one of society's most 
vexing problems.

For the court to be effective, however, it needs to be accompanied by a 
strong drug treatment infrastructure.

Drug-related crime clogs the criminal justice system and is labor intensive 
and stressful for law enforcement officers, who risk their lives trying to 
bust meth labs and dope dealers.

A drug court appears to be an efficient means of addressing the matter.

Here's how it would work:

It primarily would be for first-time drug offenders who must waive 
preliminary hearings and plead guilty to drug charges brought against them. 
Defendants typically would be sentenced to six months to a year of 
intensive therapy rather than jail. Charges would be dropped from the 
defendants' records if therapy were completed successfully.

The court would have one prosecutor and one defense attorney assigned to 
select which defendants are eligible for the program.

The drug court system would be designed to help reduce the state's prison 
population and give first offenders the opportunity to go straight, 
short-circuiting chronic recidivism.

Bannock County Public Defender Randy Schulthies recently returned from an 
Idaho Summit for Courts and Children in Boise. A judge from Prescott, 
Ariz., said the drug court there works well, but a drug treatment network 
is required.

Schulthies says if the Bannock County and 6th judicial districts don't get 
closer access to inpatient drug treatment and halfway houses, a drug court 
here is doomed to fail and addicts will continue to suffer.

"Especially with the meth problem, pretty intense treatment is needed to 
get them over the hill," he says. "The idea of a drug court is very good. 
If you don't have treatment for people, it's a revolving door. I have heard 
no one opposed to it."

Smith, Hiedeman and Schulthies recently met with Brian Underwood, a 
probation and parole officer and Pocatello councilman who expressed support 
for the concept. School counselors and health and welfare officials also 
like it.

Results from drug courts in Canyon, Ada and Kootenai counties generally are 
good. Smith, Hiedeman, Schulthies and Trial Court Administrator Suzanne 
Johnson plan to observe a session of a new drug court in Bonneville County.

"We're working with the state to bring resources to this area for 
treatment," Schulthies says. A drug court in Bannock County could not be a 
reality until the end of the year.

"It's needed. As much money as taxpayers of the state of Idaho are spending 
on Department of Corrections facilities, some of that money is better spent 
in treatment," Schulthies says. "Continuing to build prisons is not 
resolving problems."

Getting money for treating first offenders is crucial for the drug court. 
Preventing them from returning to the judicial system will streamline the 
process and save thousands of dollars in the long run.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Terry Liittschwager