Pubdate: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 Source: Minneapolis Star-Tribune (MN) Copyright: 2000 Star Tribune Contact: 425 Portland Ave., Minneapolis MN 55488 Fax: 612-673-4359 Feedback: http://www.startribune.com/stonline/html/userguide/letform.html Website: http://www.startribune.com/ Forum: http://talk.startribune.com/cgi-bin/WebX.cgi Author: Jared Kotler, Associated Press COLOMBIA REFUSES TO TEST POSSIBLE COCA-KILLING FUNGUS BOGOTA, Colombia - The Colombian government says it has no intention of testing or even further studying a fungus promoted by the United Nations and the United States as a potential "silver bullet" for killing coca plants. In an interview, environment minister Juan Mayr said the U.S. State Department "told lies" when it reported last week that Colombia had agreed to field test the fungus before deciding whether to it use against cocaine-producing plants. "We will not accept the introduction of any foreign element, which is what they have offered us under the name Fusarium oxysporum," Mayr told The Associated Press on Friday, adding that: "We have told them to forget it." Mayr said a team of scientists from the government, Bogota's National University, and several prestigious private institutes examined the plan presented several months ago under U.N. auspices, and rejected it categorically. They warned of possible mutations and adverse affects on people and the environment in the delicate Amazon basin, where most of Colombia's coca is grown. Based on expert opinions, "I think it makes no sense to permit the entry of an external biological agent that can have an adverse affect on our ecosystems," said Mayr, who has the authority to reject the use of any herbicide based on the fungus in Colombia. Mayr said the government would welcome funding for research into alternative biological controls based on "blights" or even insects already present in the coca-growing areas. He said there was no evidence that Fusarium oxysporum - an outbreak of which ravaged coca in Peru in the early 1990s - exists in the southern states where most of the nearly 300,000 acres of coca are grown. Nor does the government plan to look for it further, Mayr added. Last week, a State Department spokesman said reports that Colombia had agreed to a U.S.-funded testing program were accurate. The New York Times reported on July 6 that the Colombian government had agreed to such a program under U.S. pressure. Washington's leverage here is undoubtedly growing as Colombia prepares to receive the bulk of a $1.3 billion U.S. aid package President Clinton signed on Thursday for stemming an explosion of cocaine production in the South American country. The aid, much of it for military helicopters, would permit increased aerial eradication of coca crops using chemical herbicides already approved by Mayr's ministry. Armed leftist rebels entrenched in the coca regions have impeded fumigation, often firing on crop dusting planes. The rebels and peasant coca farmers contend chemical spraying causes illnesses, and kills food crops as well as coca - not to mention forcing growers to cut down more virgin forest in order to replant their wilted crops. The development of a safe, nontoxic, Fusarium-based herbicide that kills only the coca would "obviate these concerns" argued the spurned U.N. proposal, which was to be funded with a $300,000 grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. But according to Mayr, many of the complaints about the approved herbicide - - known as glyphosate - are highly exaggerated. He said it would be better to keep spraying glyphosate while developing biological alternatives than to introduce a potentially hazardous fungus. Amid complaints from environmentalists, the state of Florida last year ditched a plan to test a strain of Fusarium against marijuana crops. Colombians wonder why the U.S. government is so eager to use it in their country. "Why apply it, even in a test, on Colombian territory and not in the United States?" Bogota's leading El Tiempo newspaper said in its editorial on Saturday. "Is destroying coca a mission to be carried out at any cost, without any considerations?" - --- MAP posted-by: Terry Liittschwager