Pubdate: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 Source: Washington Post (DC) Copyright: 2000 The Washington Post Company Page: A01 - Front Page Contact: 1150 15th Street Northwest, Washington, DC 20071 Feedback: http://washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/edit/letters/letterform.htm Website: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ Author: Mike Allen, Washington Post Staff Writer Note: Staff writer Al Kamen contributed to this report. Related: A Nomination to Oppose http://www.drugsense.org/dsw/2000/ds00.n180.html#sec1 Ashcroft Nomination for Attorney General Bodes Ill for Drug Policy Reform http://www.drcnet.org/wol/166.html#ashcroft Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?177 (Bush) BUSH'S CHOICES DEFY TALK OF CONCILIATION Cabinet Is Diverse but Not Politically President-elect Bush is defying predictions of a bipartisan government and instead is naming a Cabinet that is little different from one he would have chosen if he had won a resounding victory, Bush advisers said. These advisers said Bush has determined that the best way to establish his legitimacy despite his messy victory is to lead as if he had a mandate. So he is nominating thoroughbred conservatives to his Cabinet instead of appeasing Democrats with moderates, and is vowing to take his campaign platform to Capitol Hill undiluted even though his allies there are urging him to start with chewable bites. "The feeling is that the country deserves governance and if you don't assert the sovereignty and legitimacy of your administration from the outset, you undermine your ability to achieve your goals later," an adviser said. "A touchstone of the Bush governing style is inclusiveness, but with a very strong philosophical compass." Bush's approach has become increasingly bold since his address on Dec. 13, the night Vice President Gore conceded. Back then, Bush called on the nation to "rise above a house divided," and added, "I was not elected to serve one party, but to serve one nation." Since then, all 12 of Bush's Cabinet selections have been Republicans. Bush delighted the party's right wing with a string of nominations that continued Friday with his selection of Gale A. Norton, a former Colorado attorney general and ardent advocate of property rights, as interior secretary. The week before, he nominated defeated Sen. John D. Ashcroft (R-Mo.), one of the most vocal Christian conservatives in public life, to succeed Janet Reno as attorney general. "The journey from Reno to Ashcroft is a journey from utter darkness to brilliant light," said Jerry L. Falwell, the founder of the Moral Majority. The choices of Ashcroft and Norton stunned Democrats after Bush's pledge that he planned a period of "reconciliation and unity." Commentators had predicted that Bush, having lost the popular vote by more than half a million and facing a tied Senate and a House with a bare Republican majority, would move quickly to signal that he planned to govern from the center. Thomas E. Mann, a Brookings Institution scholar specializing in American governance, said that instead, Bush has shown "no concession to the fragility of his victory." "Given the Florida recount, the Ashcroft nomination is just breathtaking," Mann said. "Democrats are going through the niceties of the transition period, but beneath the surface is hostility and disbelief that Bush is proceeding in this fashion." Bush indicated last week that he has had trouble recruiting a big-name Democrat. He joked that he is "not having trouble getting Democrats to return my phone calls," but added that most of those he has consulted "want to stay in place." Bush advisers said Republican activists had rebelled at the idea of offering one of the top Cabinet slots to the other party after Republicans had spent eight years winning back the White House. And a campaign official said Bush's efforts to woo current senators were doomed aborning because of the 50-50 party split in the chamber. Now the only slots left in the core Cabinet are the secretariats of energy, labor and transportation, which a campaign official said will make it all the harder for Bush to lure a Democrat from a lucrative corporate or legal career. The president typically confers Cabinet status on several other senior positions, including United Nations ambassador and CIA director, which is where Bush may finally land his Democrat, the official said. Bush, who is spending New Year's weekend at his Texas ranch, plans to be back in the announcement business as soon as Tuesday, when he intends to begin a two-day economic summit in Austin. He said on Thursday that he hopes to complete his Cabinet by the end of this week but added, "Don't hold me to it." Despite Democratic complaints about Ashcroft and Norton, some critics have been mollified by his Cabinet's gravitas. Many of Bush's other nominees, including Donald H. Rumsfeld for secretary of defense, held lofty positions in earlier Republican administrations and seem certain to be treated with deference because of their stature and their deep personal relationships on Capitol Hill. "The caliber of people that he has convinced to serve shows he is interested in governing, not just making political statements," said Sen. Don Nickles (R-Okla.). Bush's press secretary, Ari Fleischer, said he does not believe Ashcroft's nomination will hurt Bush. "We view this as a real chance for bipartisanship to be displayed by the Senate, and we expect that the Senate will proceed in a bipartisan fashion," he said. Indeed, key Democratic senators said privately that barring a startling revelation, Ashcroft should win swift confirmation in part because of senators' tradition of approving their own. Congressional aides said Norton, the nominee for interior secretary, can expect the roughest time of any of the nominees designated so far. Norton -- a protege of James Watt, who was President Ronald Reagan's first interior secretary and was anathema to environmentalists -- has advocated corporate self-policing over federal regulation of the wilds in some cases. Ashcroft and Wisconsin Gov. Tommy G. Thompson, the nominee for secretary of health and human services, face opposition from women's groups. Kate Michelman, president of the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League, called them "hard-line anti-choice appointments." "I thought President-elect Bush, having come through a very tortured election, would have made nominations that are more tempered," Michelman said. "He has laid the gauntlet down on the two most critical nominations when it comes to women's reproductive rights." But Republicans said Bush's unexpectedly conservative nominations are smart politics for several reasons. "He's never going to please professional Washington Democrats, so it's more important that he demonstrate a quiet competence than bipartisanship," Republican strategist Roger Stone said. Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, said Bush "has gotten 90 percent of the benefit" of nominating a Democrat simply by demonstrating that he would seriously consider it. Norquist also contends that a narrow victory "is an argument for maintaining your strength with your base." "You can't afford to lose any piece of the coalition as you attempt to build on it," Norquist said. "In the '70s, Democrats had radical feminists coming in the front door and Catholics going out the back door. Bush cannot trade temporary allies for the alienation of permanent allies." Several people close to Bush said that although he would have worked toward demographic diversity in his Cabinet under any circumstances, they believe his narrow victory has resulted in even more selections of women and minorities. Only half of Bush's Cabinet nominees have been white males. He also has nominated three women, two African American men and a Hispanic man. He also has named an African American woman and a Hispanic man to top positions on his White House staff -- Condoleezza Rice as national security adviser and Alberto R. Gonzales for White House counsel. In addition to his conservative nominations, Bush is maintaining his devotion to the full tax cut of $1.3 trillion over nine years he proposed during the campaign, even though his allies in Congress are urging him to go first for smaller cuts, including elimination of the estate tax and a reduction in the marriage penalty. Aides have left the door open to that route by saying Bush also favors those measures. Bush aides said he would also stick to the rest of his priorities, which include adding a private component to Social Security, helping parents move their children from failing schools, making prescription drug coverage affordable to Medicare patients and modernizing the military. "One of the things he has learned from watching his father and as Texas governor is that the best way to get the best deal in a divided government is to start out with your own agenda," an adviser said. "He understands there's going to be compromise, but he wants to compromise from a position of strength." That time may not be far off. Congressional aides said that with House Minority Leader Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo.) thirsting to become House speaker after the 2002 elections, and with several senators planning presidential campaigns in 2004, they see little incentive for Democratic leaders to cooperate with Bush. Bush's legislative strategy accounts for that by focusing on individual senators and members so that he can bring along what he calls "like-minded Democrats" on specific issues, regardless of the leadership's stance. "There are sizable minorities of Democrats who will vote with him on every one of his agenda items," an adviser said. Fleischer offered an insight into Bush's approach when discussing plans for the education summit that Bush held in Austin on Dec. 21 as part of an effort to court rank-and-file Democratic moderates. Fleischer said several Democrats declined to come to the summit -- but at least they had been called. "That creates goodwill," he said. "That is how he governed in Texas -- a very inclusive process, and he listens. He goes to those meetings with a very concrete set of ideas that he wants to enact into law, and he will press the case." - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake