Pubdate: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 Source: Bakersfield Californian (CA) Copyright: 2000, The Bakersfield Californian Contact: PO Box 440, Bakersfield, CA 93302-0440 Website: http://www.bakersfield.com/ Author: Fred Ludwig Bookmark: Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act (CA) http://www.mapinc.org/prop36.htm D.A. WON'T LET UP ON DRUG OFFENDERS The Kern County District Attorney's office will continue to prosecute drug-possession cases despite a ballot measure requiring treatment of nonviolent drug users. District Attorney Edward Jagels had said he might stop some of the drug prosecutions affected by the November passage of Proposition 36, saying the measure all but legalizes narcotics in some cases. But Jagels said last week he has decided, for now, to continue investing resources in those prosecutions, even though drug users affected by the state measure cannot be jailed. Those offenders will at least be under the supervision that goes along with probation, Jagels said. And they can be imprisoned if they violate probation for non-drug reasons, Jagels said. Other details about changes in the prosecution of such offenders still must be worked out before the measure takes effect July 1, Jagels said. Many users already are sentenced to drug-treatment programs instead of jail, but the programs will be less effective in many cases without the threat of incarceration for those who fail, prosecutors have complained. The measure was needed because just sending people to prison ignores the addictions causing the problems in the first place, said Kern public defender Mark Arnold. Treatment in those cases is a better use of public funds than prisons, Arnold said. "If one thing has been proven by the war on drugs, it's that the current system does not work," Arnold said. "We have a large drug problem on our hands." The new law allocates $120 million a year across the state for treatment programs. Many Kern programs already have waiting lists. The new funds will not go far, said Kern's chief probation officer, Larry Rhoades. "You're talking about a massive program," Rhoades said. Many effects of the new law remain unclear, such as what penalties are available when people fail court-ordered drug tests, Rhoades said. He said he is waiting for legal guidance from state officials on such questions. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Stevens