Pubdate: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 Source: National Public Radio (US) Show: All Things Considered Copyright: 2001 National Public Radio Contact: http://www.npr.org/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1296 Host: Robert Siegel Guest: Dr. Lonny Shavelson Related: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n1020/a05.html http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v00/n1722/a02.html DR. LONNY SHAVELSON DISCUSSES FINDINGS FROM HIS NEW BOOK "HOOKED" This is ALL THINGS CONSIDERED from NPR News. I'm Robert Siegel. It is a truism nowadays that drug addiction should be fought through treatment, a proposition that Lonny Shavelson does not dispute. But Shavelson would add an important caveat. He says addiction treatment services need to be fixed. Lonny Shavelson is a doctor and writer who spent two years interviewing addicts in treatment. At the end of his book "Hooked," he poses this question: Does rehab work for those who are most disastrously addicted? His answer: 'I still don't know. In the two years of this investigation, I rarely saw rehab done well enough to learn if it might work.' "Hooked" focuses on five addicts in San Francisco. One of them is named Mike. Dr. LONNY SHAVELSON (Author, "Hooked"): Michael Paxilian(ph). He is a 34-year-old man who was a plumber, who was married, had two children, and is one of those tragedies of what we see with heroin abuse. He was a heroin user, and basically his family and his entire life fell apart. One of the things that was hidden behind all of this was that when Mike was young--from the ages of about six to 12--he was sort of bounced around our foster care system. And during two years in one of the homes, he was repeatedly raped as a child alongside his sister. So what you see is a severely traumatized person who had very, very major trauma in his life as a child; later on, kind of got it together, then got addicted to drugs. He was using heroin as a way to get rid of flashbacks and nightmares he was having about those childhood rapes. He got desperate. He knocked on that door of rehab. He went to the central intake center where I met him. Number one, they really focused on his drug abuse. They did everything they could to get him to stop using drugs and just about everything they could to ignore the underlying issues in his life that were causing him, or leading him, to use drugs. And I don't make any excuses for people who use heroin or who use drugs. But you have to understand that if you're going to get Mike to not need to use heroin, you have to have very advanced psychological care to help him deal with those other traumas. But what you see in the rehab facilities is the second important point, is that most people who are counselors and advisers in rehab facilities are ex-addicts who have zero training except for the fact that they're ex-addicts, they've become clean and sober and they've been through a program. SIEGEL: And the case of Mike, as you discovered, far from being exotic, involved something that you found amazingly common among men who are addicts and who are in various stages of rehab: some childhood experience of sexual abuse. Dr. SHAVELSON: Uh-huh. Well, as I was interviewing people in the programs--and I interviewed, you know, close to 200 people by the end, although I followed this five most intensely--I thought I was making a mistake in my interview questions because almost everybody was talking to me about child sexual abuse, and I just thought it's impossible that this could be such a high rate of people who are molested as children. It turns out that an article came out in the Journal of the American Medical Association about the time I was doing this research that shows that when you are sexually abused as a child, your addiction rate does not double or it doesn't triple. The rate of addiction in children who've had sexual abuse goes up 25 to 50 times higher than the rest of the population. And that's for men. For women--some 70 percent of women in rehab have had prior sexual abuse before they were addicted to drugs. So I began to realize that what we're dealing with is a tremendously traumatized population. We're putting them in houses--for instance, Walden House, where I spent most of my time in San Francisco, had 120 addicts and they had one single therapist in the house. And those are the type of people that if they're going to get off drugs need really good psychological care. SIEGEL: One of the problems you encountered in your reporting on the rehab system was the tension between rehab programs that insist on your being drug-free, and you're not let in if you're high. And on the other hand, the reality that the people they're dealing with, even if they're getting off of drugs, will go back and get high. They will relapse. Dr. SHAVELSON: Well, this struck me as one of the greatest ironies of anything that I saw in my two years sort of in the underworld of the rehab industry. It's very, very clear that drug addiction is a problem of obsessive use of drugs where people come in and they come in asking for help because they can't stop drugs on their own. What happens is they come into the programs and some of them--actually, a significant amount--will at some point in time lose it, not do well, go back and use drugs again. And what the programs say is, 'Well, you're using drugs. We're kicking you out of the program.' And what amazed me about that was a couple of things. I don't know of any other disease where you have to be cured of the disease before you get help. The second thing is that these people were clearly getting worse. What happened was during the time of their rehabilitation, they had a relapse and they got worse. And instead of increasing care--which is the appropriate thing to do for any illness including drug and alcoholism--what they did was a process called spotting. Spotting means that, 'We catch you with drugs, you're out the door on the spot. You can come back in about three weeks and get your clothes and all that, but we throw you out.' I've seen this happen in the middle of the night at 3:00 in the morning for a woman who was found using drugs. It's dangerous in the streets at 3:00 in the morning, and it's not helpful and it's not therapeutic for programs to throw out people because they're found to use drugs. SIEGEL: You're trained as a physician. Dr. SHAVELSON: That's correct. SIEGEL: As an emergency room physician, in fact. Dr. SHAVELSON: Mm-hmm. SIEGEL: Has the wisdom that this is an illness--if it's wisdom--actually penetrated the system that's trying to cope with it? Dr. SHAVELSON: Well, I think you're pointing out one contradiction. The wisdom really has. Most of the people in the programs really believe now--and again, most of the counselors are ex-addicts, and they really believe and have heard the message that this is an illness and it's a hard-to-treat illness. But they haven't made that next step, which is that you can't treat an illness by punishing it out of a person. There are many other ways to deal with it. There's never been a single shred of evidence that humiliation and this boot camp approach is effective in treating addiction or any other emotional problems. SIEGEL: Well, where did all this leave you in terms of your view of treatment? After all, the fork in the road we're at is not necessarily between good treatment or bad treatment, but as you say between an emphasis on treatment or on incarceration. You didn't come away from this any more favorably disposed toward incarceration. Dr. SHAVELSON: No, I did not. What I came away from this thinking is that what I'm seeing is a fairly unregulated and very important and very expensive industry. And actually, I had a lot of hope for what could happen in treatment. I saw some changes that happened to people that were phenomenal, and then it was lost at some point in time as the programs began to make some fairly severe errors, especially in regard to how to deal with relapse. But what I did see was I saw some people--Glenda Januss(ph), who was this Lakota Indian, came to San Francisco when she was about 18 or 20 after being an alcoholic for three years, was 32 when I met her and was still drinking heavily and looked like she was 65. When they first found Glenda, she was lying in the street. She had maggots in her legs from wounds that she had had from falling that never healed. Three months later, she was cleaned up, sober, had insight into her illness and had a wonderful experience in rehab. What happened then was this. When Glenda was cleaned up and sober, there was no connection to housing, there was no connection to job training, no connection for child care, no family therapy, no other treatment. And they wound up having to send her back, basically, to the same neighborhood where she used to hang out with her drinking buddies and drink, to Salvation Army-sponsored clean-and-sober housing, which had a very simple rule which is that, 'If you drink, you're out of here.' So again, in this particular case, what you were seeing was no connection to aftercare. In three months they tried to fix an illness she'd had for 30 years and didn't provide her with further services. That was basically throwing away our money. We have a budget of, you know, some $ 9.2 billion in the United States that is dealing with drug-abuse issues of which only 18 percent goes to rehab. If we take that 18 percent that goes to rehab, and instead of sending it to Colombia to buy more helicopters, we use that to find housing for some of the people that are getting out of the programs who do job training or provide them with advanced psychological care that they need. And so we bounce that 18 percent up to let's say 25 percent and then you'd have a very functioning rehab system with the one other proviso is that we have to start training counselors because the untrained counselors are not doing the job that they need to do. SIEGEL: Well, Lonny Shavelson, thank you very much for talking with us. Dr. SHAVELSON: It's my pleasure. SIEGEL: Lonny Shavelson's book is called "Hooked: Five Addicts Challenge Our Misguided Drug Rehab System." You're listening to ALL THINGS CONSIDERED, from NPR News. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake