Pubdate: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 Source: Miami Herald (FL) Copyright: 2001 The Miami Herald Contact: http://www.herald.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/262 Author: Juan O. Tamayo SPRAYING BLITZ CRIPPLES COLOMBIAN DRUG CROP LA HORMIGA, Colombia -- It is harvest time in the mint-green hills of southern Putumayo state, the epicenter of Colombia's coca cultivation. But coca farmers such as Gabriel Nieto are in no mood to celebrate. The price of what everyone here calls simply "the merchandise" has plunged following a U.S.-backed aerial defoliation campaign in December and January that turned huge expanses of coca bushes into dead brown stalks. Stepped-up army patrols have limited supply and driven up the cost of chemicals needed to make cocaine, and thousands of farmers and itinerant leaf pickers have moved out, leaving behind half-filled brothels and churches. "Now we can barely squeeze a few pesos out of this," Nieto, 38, grumbled as he mixed 750 pounds of coca leaf with lime and gasoline under an open-sided hut, grandly called a "laboratory," to produce a pound of unrefined cocaine known as coca base. Seven months after the spraying blitz in Putumayo kicked off the counter-drug campaign broadly known as Plan Colombia, early results suggest that the offensive has dealt a powerful blow to the local coca industry. U.S. and Colombian officials caution that it is too early to assess the campaign, backed by $1.3 billion in U.S. aid. The plan aims to cut Colombia's cocaine output in half by 2005 and shave the drug income of leftist guerrillas and right-wing militias waging Latin America's most violent conflict. The impact has not yet been felt in the price of cocaine on U.S. streets, and the campaign -- a three-point strategy of spraying, army interdictions and giving subsidies to farmers who agree to uproot their coca bushes -- is in danger of losing its spraying leg. GROWING OPPOSITION One reason is growing opposition inside and outside Colombia to the use of chemicals, which critics say sicken peasants and poison the land. A Bogota court Friday issued a preliminary injunction against all spraying but gave the government three days to reply and said it would issue a more detailed ruling in 10 days. The government said it was studying the ruling. Still, for now the coca business in this critical production region is faring badly. "Here, the coca business is over. Production is way down, maybe 60 percent," said Flover Mesa, mayor of La Hormiga in the Guamuez Valley, a part of Putumayo that holds one-quarter of Colombia's 402,600 acres of coca. U.S. and Colombian officials toss out all kinds of impressive numbers for the Putumayo campaign's progress -- numbers that skeptics say are the drug-war equivalent of Vietnam's meaningless "body count." Between sprayings and interdictions, "we've taken 100 metric tons off the market, and that's not insignificant," said U.S. Ambassador Anne Patterson. Colombia's total cocaine production is estimated at 560 tons per year, while U.S. consumption is put at 300 tons. Colombia's Defense Ministry reported last week that soldiers and police had sprayed 128,000 acres of coca and destroyed 663 "laboratories" in the first half of this year, almost double the totals for same period in 2000. SEIZURES DECLINE Cocaine seizures were down in the same period -- from 38 tons to 23 tons, largely because of the shortage of leaves, said Gen. Gustavo Socha, head of the Colombian National Police Anti-Narcotics Division. Mesa said the spraying blitz in the Guamuez Valley killed some 26,000 acres of coca and initially drove up the price of coca base from $1,050 to $1,400 per kilogram -- 2.2 pounds -- because of the shortage of leaf. "It was a very green Christmas -- dollar green," recalled a smiling Nieto, who farms two acres of coca and works as a hired hand in a neighbor's much bigger plot, earning $4 for every 25-pound sack of leaves he picks. But prices have now plummeted to $750 per kilo as intensified patrols by three U.S.-trained army counter-narcotics battalions scared off major buyers of base, usually sent by cocaine refineries in central and northern Colombia, and left the field to locals who are less willing to pay top prices. `TOO MANY SOLDIERS' "The buyers say there are too many soldiers, that they have to pay extra to smuggle the merchandise from here to the refineries," said Ancizar Ardila, 43, as he showed visitors his nursery of 25,000 tiny coca plants just one mile from La Hormiga. On the edge of the drab town of 13,000 people, more signs of the coca industry's downturn: a half-dozen shuttered brothels and a dozen more open but nearly empty except for a few bored-looking girls sitting on the sidewalks. "There used to be 300 prostitutes and lots of happy business with the leaf pickers who came into town on weekends to spend their salaries, but now there are less than 100," said parish priest Julian Gomez. "But most of the pickers are gone now, and even attendance at Sunday Mass is down." In a possibly more significant sign of the impact of the counter-narcotics crackdown, Guamuez Valley peasants say they have begun to believe that coca has turned into an unprofitable business. "The farmers have been doing their math and thinking that it's time to quit," said Harold Montenegro, who lost two of his three acres of coca when they were sprayed Jan. 14. "If they spray again, we're all dead." PREDICTIONS FAIL Perhaps just as significant for the long-term effectiveness of the counter-narcotics campaign, none of the hoary predictions of disaster that accompanied the start of the spraying blitz in Putumayo have come to pass. The sprayings did not drive waves of refugees into neighboring Ecuador, and leftist guerrillas from the 17,000-member Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, who collect hefty "taxes" on the coca business, have not significantly increased their attacks around the region. NO RIGHTS COMPLAINTS Nor have human rights complaints been filed against the three Colombian army counter-narcotics battalions, trained by U.S. Special Forces, that are spearheading the Putumayo campaign, U.S. officials said. "We're extremely pleased with the results" of the U.S.-trained force, said a military officer at the U.S. Embassy in Bogota. "That's got to make a dent on the [drug] trade." For all its success, the Guamuez Valley offensive has not been without problems. Fields of coca bushes only a foot high show that many farmers whose crops were sprayed either replanted or pruned their bushes immediately after the spraying, to keep the leaves from absorbing the herbicide. Montenegro estimated that one-third of the Guamuez farmers whose crops were sprayed have replanted, most of them owners of large fields who had already invested money in fertilizers, pesticides and a new high-yield strain of coca just brought in from Bolivia. Their first harvest is four months away. "I am replacing coca with coca. Yuca or plantains bring in even less money," said Manuel Palacios, a 46-year-old farmer whose two-acre lot in the village of La Vega was killed by the spraying campaign Dec. 22. Farmers said that many of the new fields are in areas declared off-limits to spraying by the government -- in Indian tribe reservations and populated areas along the edges of main roads -- or in the neighboring state of Narino to the west. And there is a black cloud on the horizon -- mounting attacks on the aerial spraying by a broad range of Colombian politicians and activists who insist that the herbicide glyphosate makes peasants ill, poisons the land and only drives coca farmers elsewhere. NO FAITH IN SPRAYING "Fumigation is easy but does not work . . . You need more, a lot of economic and social development programs, or farmers will just plant somewhere else," said Klaus Nyholm, head of the U.N. Drug Policy office in Bogota. The governors of Putumayo, Narino and four other drug-producing states have demanded a stop to the spraying, and a senator from the Conservative Party of President Andres Pastrana announced two weeks ago that he would submit legislation decriminalizing small coca fields. PRESSING AHEAD So far, Pastrana has stood by the spraying. "It is not in the government's plans to halt the fumigations," said Gonzalo de Francisco, Pastrana's national security advisor and point man on the Putumayo campaign. The U.S. government's position is much the same. "Manual eradication has a role to play but, given the amount of coca and [opium] poppy cultivation in Colombia, it can be only part of the solution," Patterson, the U.S. ambassador, said. "Especially in areas of large-scale production or where [guerrillas are] most active, it takes too long, is too dangerous and -- frankly -- it's too expensive." Patterson said Washington is paying for a study that will test blood and urine samples from 1,000 people -- 500 living in areas sprayed and 500 in areas far from the spraying -- for any signs of glyphosate. "We have a moral responsibility to be sure what we're doing is right," the ambassador told reporters Wednesday. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom