Pubdate: Mon, 27 Aug 2001
Source: Brainerd Daily Dispatch (MN)
Copyright: 2001 The Brainerd Daily Dispatch
Contact:  http://www.brainerddispatch.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1110
Author: David Broder

ARE WE LOSING THE DRUG WAR?

WASHINGTON--The high esteem in which former Rep. Asa Hutchinson of Arkansas 
is held by his colleagues was demonstrated by the 98-1 Senate vote 
confirming him last month as the new director of the Drug Enforcement 
Administration. Even more telling was the fact that Rep. John Conyers of 
Michigan, the senior Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee and an 
ardent opponent of the impeachment of President Clinton, appeared at the 
Senate Judiciary Committee hearing to praise Hutchinson, who had been one 
of the Republican House managers presenting the case against Clinton to the 
full Senate.

In his 4 1/2 years in the House, Hutchinson, a former U.S. attorney, earned 
an estimable reputation as a thoughtful conservative and, as liberals like 
Conyers and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy of Vermont 
affirmed, as a fair-minded advocate.

Hutchinson will need all his skills in his new job, for the nation is 
clearly about to embark on a long-overdue debate on the so-called "war on 
drugs." The DEA is, as the name implies, primarily a law- enforcement 
agency, but John Walters, Bush's choice to head the White House Office of 
National Drug Control Policy, has been in limbo, awaiting a confirmation 
hearing since May. Many of the same Democrats who welcomed Hutchinson's 
nomination have argued that Walters' hard- line approach, emphasizing 
interdiction and incarceration over education and treatment, makes him the 
wrong choice for "drug czar." At least until Walters' fate is resolved, 
Hutchinson is in the hot seat on Bush administration policy toward drugs.

During the last three decades, the United States has invested billions in 
fighting the scourge of drugs, and more and more serious people are 
questioning its effectiveness. The critics range from conservatives like 
Bill Buckley and New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson to an array of liberals, and 
they are having an impact on public opinion. While few agree with the 
editors of the influential British newspaper, The Economist, which last 
month laid out at length "the case for legalizing drugs," many more are 
expressing their doubts about current policies.

A Pew Research Center survey last February found that three out of four 
Americans believe "we are losing the drug war," and by a margin of 52 
percent to 35 percent they said drug use "should be treated as a disease, 
not a crime."

In a recent issue of the American Prospect magazine, California journalist 
Peter Schrag pointed to the growing trend in the states, where initiatives 
allowing medical use of marijuana or mandating treatment rather than jail 
for drug-users have been winning large public majorities.

Hutchinson was dodgy in his confirmation hearing on the question of sending 
federal agents out to arrest doctors who prescribe marijuana as a pain- and 
nausea-relieving agent for cancer patients and other seriously ill people, 
as eight states now allow. The Supreme Court held earlier this year that 
the feds have that authority. When Hutchinson was asked if he would use it, 
he said it was something on which he needed to confer with the attorney 
general, adding that it was important "that we do not send the wrong signal 
... that marijuana use is an acceptable practice."

But Hutchinson also applauded a bipartisan bill, crafted by Leahy and the 
Judiciary Committee's ranking Republican, Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, to 
expand funding of drug treatment programs, especially for prisoners and 
youths, and to increase the number of drug courts, where judges can order 
nonviolent drug offenders to undergo treatment and continuing tests, rather 
than put them in jail.

Hutchinson took over his DEA duties last week at the same time the 
Department of Justice bragged that more people than ever are in federal 
prison on drug charges and are serving longer sentences. That report showed 
there were more suspects arrested in 1999 on charges involving marijuana 
than for powder or crack cocaine. A higher portion of the marijuana 
suspects who wound up in federal prison were simply users than was the case 
with any of the hard drugs.

That raises obvious questions about the priorities of federal drug 
enforcement agents and prosecutors. No one seems to know how many people 
are in state prisons for simple possession of marijuana. But in 1998, those 
prisons held 236,800 people convicted on drug charges--57 percent more than 
had been there in 1990.

The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University 
estimated in 1998 that 70 percent to 85 percent of all state prison 
inmates--not just those convicted on drug charges--need treatment, but only 
13 percent of them get it.

The whole "war on drugs" cries out for re-examination.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Keith Brilhart