Pubdate: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 Source: Door County Advocate (WI) Website: http://www.doorcountyadvocate.com/ Address: 235 N. Third Av., Sturgeon Bay, WI. 54235 Feedback: http://216.127.216.103/advocate/letters.html#writexx Copyright: 2001 Door County Advocate Fax: 920-743-5817 Author: Mike Shaw 'EVIL' IS ONE TOUGH ENEMY A war against evil-doers. Wiping evil from the face of the Earth. Those are tall orders, though eminently necessary ones, that President Bush outlined for the nation and world. Evil - or at least sin - has been around since Adam first took a liking to apple juice, and the conventional wisdom was that it would not or could not be eliminated until Judgment Day. As a purposefully exaggerated slogan to rally around as America marches off to a war against terrorism, Bush's words hit the mark; as a practical goal, even he must know it's impossible. In just the last generation, there have been at least four declared wars against social ills, as opposed to enemy states: President Johnson's war against poverty in the 1960s, President Ford's war against inflation in the 1970s, each succeeding president's war against drugs, and countless wars against all crime in major metropolitan centers across the United States. None has been totally won, though the $40 billion approved by Congress last week for the latest war displays the type of massive, single-minded commitment that might have done the job in any of those earlier decades. By now, everyone must be coming to the realization that this will be no Persian Gulf War, no quick-strike, in and out, relatively clean and convenient battlefield. It could very well be a war without end, a war requiring an infinite and never-flinching resolve, for until the roots of terrorism are torn out like trees and never allowed to reseed in the form of new generations of radical, violent Muslims victory cannot be declared. This is not an enemy that will raise a white flag like Japan did after Hiroshima or Nagasaki - not even if, like most rational humans, his own people and life are in peril. Going after the roots means neutering every known terrorist follower across the globe and applying intense pressure, to the point of declaring war, against any nation that gives them comfort and care. A news report in recent days said Bush has "not ruled out ground troops." Well, that's great news because there would be no other way to win. "Going to the roots" for some observers so far has meant examining the reasons why some Middle Eastern countries and inhabitants hate us so. Certainly is a valid opinion, but it's tomorrow's discussion. It would be comparable to letting off a convicted killer or rapist because "society" was to blame for the crime. Without doubt, a war against (pick one) poverty/crime/drugs will not be won without identifying the base problems. But acknowledging that fact does not diminish the moral requirement to sentence the criminal or, in this case, take down the terrorist. Lastly, the president should be thankful that our allies have not held it against us that we snubbed them over the Kyoto air emissions treaty and our missile defense initiative. Although it might be in their best interests, too, to snuff out terrorism, our global friends might invite attacks on themselves by helping us. If London had absorbed an IRA attack on the scale of New York and Washington, would we have assisted them or put America's interests and only America's interests first - the direction our foreign policy was heading before Sept. 11? As one commentator said, the surprise attacks should "erase the concept in some quarters that America can somehow go it alone in the fight against terrorism, or in anything else for that matter." The words of some liberal still upset over the November election? No, that came from the president's father, the ex-president. - --- MAP posted-by: Beth