Pubdate: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 Source: Lubbock Avalanche-Journal (TX) Copyright: 2001 The Lubbock Avalanche-Journal Contact: http://www.lubbockonline.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/841 Author: Linda Kane, Avalanche-Journal Bookmarks: http://www.mapinc.org/testing.htm (Drug Testing) http://www.mapinc.org/lockney.htm (The Lockney Policy) http://www.mapinc.org/tulia.htm (Tulia, Texas) http://www.mapinc.org/youth.htm (Youth) TULIA PARENT OBJECTS TO DRUG TEST POLICY The father of a Tulia high school student will not support a policy that subjects his son to random drug testing at school. Alan Bean expressed those sentiments during a school board meeting Tuesday. Bean told the board that he feels it's unconstitutional to subject his son and other students to drug testing in order to participate in athletics. Bean's son, Amos, a 15-year-old sophomore, plays football and will refuse the school district if it requests him to submit to a random urinalysis for drug screening, his father said. The complaints come after U.S. District Judge Mary Lou Robinson in Amarillo decided last year that the school district's mandatory, suspicionless drug testing policy of all students in extracurricular activities was unconstitutional. The school district appealed Robinson's ruling to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals where it is expected to be heard Nov. 5, Supt. Ken Miller said. The school has since changed its policy and tests only students in athletics, he said. "It's board policy, and I support it," Miller said. "The intent is to help kids refuse and not participate in illegal drug use," he said. "It's just a tool to prevent drug abuse." Miller said that 10 percent of the students in each sport will be randomly selected to participate in three tests each semester this school year. A parent in Lockney won a lawsuit in March against the school district there after claiming a similar drug testing policy was unconstitutional. Bean said he thought the issue of drug testing in the Tulia schools would be moot after Robinson's ruling last year. "I was quite sure the school would simply drop the drug testing pending their appeal, and when it didn't, I was quite surprised," Bean said. The judge's ruling prevented the school district from testing two students who contested the policy. Bean said the ruling should apply to the entire student body. "My feeling is that TISD is presently showing contempt for Judge Robinson's ruling," Bean said. Bean said he voiced his concerns to the school board in an effort to urge them to drop their drug testing policy. "I wanted them to be very clear about what my concerns were before I took the very drastic step of seeking legal remedies," Bean said. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake