Pubdate: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 Source: Lima News (OH) Copyright: 2001 Freedom Newspapers Inc. Contact: PO Box 690, Lima, Ohio 45802-0690 Website: http://www.limanews.com DRUG WAR FILLING PRISONS In every society, in every era throughout history, there has been a class of hard-core sociopaths who have habitually preyed upon others. Sometimes, with a helping hand from the law itself. Take Prohibition, for an example. It sought to outlaw a personal predilection among consenting adults and wound up simply driving drinkers underground into the notorious "speak-easies" of the 1920s, which tended to be owned and operated by gangsters. After all, no legitimate business could sell alcohol. So, the criminal element filled the void. Thus did this federally sanctioned policy line the pockets of petty criminals and crime kingpins alike. They were people who in many cases thought nothing of thieving, killing or shooting it out with the cops. So, merely breaking another law by selling liquor was of little consequence to them. Sure, some went to prison from time to time, but it was worth the risk as they lined their pockets. Similarly, today's criminal element is reaping untold wealth from the drug war. Once again, because a personal predilection of consenting adults has been deemed criminal, those who partake are turning to those who are willing to meet their needs. And, like yesterday's beer and rum runners, some of today's drug runners are pretty dangerous people. Plenty of them, like their forbears during Prohibition, wind up doing time. Ohio has its share. Hence, the tug of war over the soaring incarceration rate and what to do about it. Build more prisons, some say. They point to the long-run decline in the overall crime rate, statewide and nationally, and note how it has paralleled a general stiffening of sentences over the years for a wide range of crimes. Others, however, counter that prison crowding is a needless result of the war on drugs and the broad net it has cast over "victimless crimes." Drug use by consenting adults is at worst a social ill and not a crime, they say, and should be addressed with measures such as counseling - not more jail time. Both sides make compelling arguments. We've argued ever more pointedly over the years that drug use seems no more or less a social ill than the use of alcohol and in principle should be regarded similarly. Indeed, all of the ill-effects of alcohol consumption on society at large arguably overshadow those of drug use. Yet no one seriously suggests a return to prohibition. Still, we must acknowledge that among those doing hard time on drug-related charges aren't just users who were penalized for their personal predilections, but also many habitual criminals who took advantage of drugs' illegality to prey upon society, often violently, and make a fast buck. They're the same sort who'd burglarize your home, steal your car or stick up your neighborhood liquor store (ironically). Not because of drugs but because they have no intention of making an honest living. In other words, they're the same people who would violate the lives, liberty and property of the law-abiding in any event. And not all of them are committing those crimes just because they're hooked on some addictive drug and need to pay the freight. No, plenty of those jailed over the drug trade are the shiftless opportunists who've always afflicted society. Make no mistake, the war by every level of government on drug use, sales and distribution is creating a golden opportunity for society's dropouts. So government has only itself to blame for enriching and empowering them. And it's a safe bet that ending drug prohibition would deprive them of that cash cow. Yet, so long as we already have many of those habitual criminals behind bars - those who'll seek out another racket when the drug war finally is over, and someday it will be - what do we do with them? No question, the costly and unwinnable drug war has us in a jam. But how do we find our way out? - --- MAP posted-by: Beth