Pubdate: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 Source: Sunday Times (UK) Copyright: 2001 Times Newspapers Ltd. Contact: http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/439 Author: David Leppard DRUG ADVISERS CONSIDER RELAXING LAWS ON ECSTASY THE government's top advisers on drugs are considering relaxing the law on ecstasy, the rave drug used by an estimated 2m young people. A key member of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, the statutory body set up to advise ministers on drugs policy, says there are grounds for downgrading ecstasy from a class A drug to class B. Such a move would halve the maximum sentence for conviction in a magistrates' court for possession to three months. Roger Howard, an advisory council member who runs Drugscope, Britain's leading drug charity and a centre of expertise on narcotics, said the council had seen new evidence suggesting the ecstasy law could be relaxed. "We have reached no conclusions, but this [evidence] lends support to the view that some drugs have not been appropriately classified, and that's not just cannabis," he said. Ecstasy kills about 10 people a year, but members of the council say it is not addictive and not as harmful as other class A drugs, such as heroin and crack cocaine. Although David Blunkett, the home secretary, said last week that he believed ecstasy should remain class A after his move to downgrade cannabis, the committee has a strong influence on government thinking. Blunkett proposed relaxing cannabis laws so that possession would no longer be an arrestable offence, making it easier for police to target hard drugs such as heroin and crack cocaine. He said this would be done only if "the advisory committee see fit". In an unreported statement to MPs, which shows the value he places on the council's views, Blunkett made it clear that he would go ahead with the cannabis proposal only "if the advisory committee see fit to do so". It emerged last night that chief constables had called for ecstasy to be downgraded in evidence submitted for the Runciman report on drugs two years ago. It was also reported that Tom Watson, a Labour member of the home affairs select committee, has written to its chairman calling for it to concentrate on the laws regarding ecstasy in its drugs inquiry. The Home Office last week said there were no plans to relax the law on ecstasy. But critics point out that only two months ago Downing Street was saying the same about cannabis. This weekend anti-drugs campaigners opposed any relaxation on cannabis or ecstasy. Paul Betts, a former police inspector whose daughter Leah died after taking ecstasy at her 18th birthday party six years ago, said the move would go against medical evidence that suggested the drug created suicidal tendencies in half its users and contributed to heart attacks and strokes. "This is deplorable," he said. "I saw Tony Blair and Mo Mowlam [then drugs minister] in February last year with my wife and I was told face-to-face that there was no way this government was going to go soft on drugs or reclassify." Betts said ministers were effectively sacrificing the health of young people to cut policing costs. "This man [Blunkett] hasn't got a clue about how the drug culture operates. The majority of young people do not realise the dangers. "As far as I'm concerned this government has ceased putting people first and is now more concerned about money than it is about anything else. The cheap option is to turn round and say: oh well, we'll leave it to the people. If they use it, so what? We will reclassify it." Sir Michael Rawlins, the advisory council's chairman and professor of clinical pharmacology at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne, said it was too early for him to comment on its views. More than 80 people have died after taking ecstasy in Britain. Studies suggest that 500,000 people take the drug every weekend and that 15% of people aged between 16 to 24 have tried the drug. Only 1% of those over 35 had experimented. The consensus among medical experts is that ecstasy does not lead to addiction and there are no specific withdrawal symptoms. But when combined with dancing for long periods in a hot place, such as a nightclub, users can risk dehydration, which may be fatal. Research on long-term users suggests it may cause brain damage and mental illness as well as liver and kidney problems in later life. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Stevens