Pubdate: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 Source: Bucks County Courier Times (PA) Copyright: 2001 Calkins Newspapers. Inc. Contact: http://www.phillyburbs.com/feedback/content_cti.shtml Website: http://www.phillyburbs.com/couriertimes/index.shtml Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1026 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/youth.htm (Youth) SCHOOL DOG SEARCHES PRACTICAL AND LEGAL Our view: Random drug-dog searches of school hallways don't violate students' rights and are a practical way to make kids aware that someone's watching. The Pennsbury School District doesn't have a big drug problem but has approved hiring a company whose specialty is sniffing out illegal substances - literally sniffing them out using highly trained dogs. What gives? Let's call it preventative maintenance. Still, the district's decision potentially raises two controversies. One involves the constitutional rights of the students whose lockers might be searched. The other has to do with hiring a private, out-of-state company vs. using local police canines and the county DA's opposition to funding drug sweeps in the schools. District Attorney Diane Gibbons is against using drug forfeiture funds to reimburse local police for the canine searches, calling such searches ineffective and likening them to using "storm troopers" to shut down a school "like it was a prison." She also worries about violating the students' constitutional rights. The matter of students' civil rights is necessarily an important concern. But students have no right to possess illegal substances of any kind. And student representatives on the school board - present for the vote approving the searches - said they didn't foresee student opposition. In fact, using dogs to search out such substances can be done in a way that passes muster with the courts. And we think there is practical value in "reminding kids that someone is watching," as a Central Bucks official said in explaining his district's motivation for likewise deciding to conduct periodic drug-dog searches. Some kids need such reminders, and schools that choose to offer them are to be applauded. Criticism should be reserved for those schools that would rather ignore their drug problems. If Pennsbury is presented with a more effective, more economical proposal for searching its schools for drugs - it'll pay roughly $200 for each of 10 searches - by all means it should be considered. Meanwhile, the district's decision to move ahead speaks well of its concern for the students placed within its care. - --- MAP posted-by: Josh