Pubdate: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 Source: Saanich News (CN BC) Contact: http://www.saanichnews.com Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1209 Author: Vern Faulkner, Saanich News Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmjcn.htm (Cannabis - Medicinal - Canada) LAWYER SAYS REGULATIONS ARE TOO VAGUE New federal regulations that took effect in the summer were intended to clarify the boundaries for use of marijuana for medicinal purposes. But Abbotsford lawyer John Conroy, who has been involved with numerous high-profile cases involving medicinal marijuana use, argues that the current laws are too vague and ambiguous. He calls the criteria for using medicinal marijuana "absurd" and says the regulations make it more difficult for people who are suffering health problems to use the drug. "What specialist is going to do that without seeing a patient? And usually it takes months to see a specialist," says Conroy, adding that many patients have to fight to achieve what he considers is a basic right to access the medicine of their choice. "We have a hard time getting doctors to do what they were authorized to do," notes Conroy, who believes that those with long-term medical conditions should be able to use marijuana without applying for special permits. "On the scale of drugs, you don't have to prescribe something like this," suggests Conroy. He points out that several popular over the counter drugs -- like ibuprofen, acetaminophen and aspirin -- have far greater toxicity and thousands of people visit hospitals for health problems related to excessive use of these drugs in North America each year. "You can't smoke enough (marijuana) to kill yourself," Conroy argued. "You'd fall asleep before that -- and that's the truth." [sidebar] There are three avenues for people who wish to legally use marijuana for medicinal reasons to pursue. 1. Patients with terminal conditions can obtain an exception from Health Canada with written permission from their physician. 2. Those with long-term health problems that are not terminal require the permission of both a general practitioner and a specialist. 3. The third category -- which includes all cases not covered in the first two -- requires written statements from one general practitioner and two specialists. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake