Pubdate: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 Source: Joplin Globe, The (MO) Copyright: 2001 The Joplin Globe Contact: http://www.joplinglobe.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/859 Author: Roger McKinney, Globe Staff Writer STUDENTS IN EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES SAY THEY SHOULD BE HELD TO HIGHER STANDARDS Conduct Rules Score With Teens There's a new code of conduct for Joplin High School students who participate in athletics, dance, cheerleading, pompon, speech and debate, vocal music and instrumental music. And, at least in part, some students say they are in agreement with the new policy. Adopted Nov. 13 by the Joplin R-8 Board of Education, the policy outlines punishments for violations that include use of alcohol, drug use or possession, tobacco use or possession, and felony and misdemeanor violations. The policy is similar to citizenship codes in other area schools, and is aimed specifically at students who participate in extracurricular activities. Punishments meted out by the school would include suspensions from games or contests, but students still would be required to attend practices unless the coach or activity sponsor decided to dismiss them from the squad. The policy calls students who are involved in extracurricular activities "ambassadors" for their school and community. "They are in the public eye and thus their personal conduct must always be above reproach," the policy reads. "They have an obligation to create a favorable image and gain the respect of fellow students, teammates and members of the Joplin community." Joplin High School seniors Greg Garrison, Stephanie Harter, Tessa Baugh and Jeff Taylor said they agree with that statement. Garrison is in band and show choir; Harter performs in show choir and dance; Baugh is in volleyball, basketball and show choir; and Taylor plays basketball and baseball. A committee composed of school officials, parents, coaches and a student worked several months on the policy before presenting it to the school board. Taylor was the student on the committee. The committee's proposal to the board did not cover speech and debate, vocal music or instrumental music. The board added those activities after some discussion. Students said they supported the expansion of the list. "I think the policy should apply to the entire school," Garrison said. Harter said students in the groups covered by the policy are those the public sees most often. "For show choir, we go to elementary schools and we perform for adults all the time," she said. "That's something that shouldn't be allowed if you're using drugs or alcohol." In its debate, the school board also decided to treat alcohol use or possession the same as drug use or possession in terms of punishment. The punishment for a first offense is suspension for 30 percent of the season. A second offense would result in suspension for a calendar year. The punishment for a third offense is permanent restriction from school activities. The students said they agreed that drug and alcohol use should result in the same punishment. "I think they should be treated the same," Taylor said. "Alcohol is a drug." He said alcohol affects decision making, harms the body and affects behavior. "And, it's illegal," Baugh added. "We're not allowed to drink." "Alcohol is a drug," Harter said. "Just because it's so widely used, that's not an excuse." The students said alcohol is a bigger problem among students than drugs. "Among all high school students, alcohol is bigger than drugs," Taylor said. "It's more available, and I guess they don't think it's quite as bad. It's more widely used." The punishment for a first offense of distributing drugs is suspension from the activity for a calendar year. A second offense would result in permanent restriction from activities. The punishment for tobacco use or possession is suspension for 10 percent of the season for a first offense, suspension for 20 percent of the season for a second offense, suspension for 30 percent of the season for a third offense, and suspension for a full year for a fourth offense. No "witch hunts" Under the code, a review committee comprising the principal, athletic director, coach or sponsor and a central office administrator decides the punishment for a misdemeanor violation. For felony violations, the student would be suspended upon the filing of the charge, barred permanently from the school activity if convicted and reinstated if acquitted. Juvenile criminal records are closed to the public. "The student will immediately report any violation of law to the athletic director," the policy reads. Asked if that was likely to happen, Taylor said it happened last year before the policy was in place, and officials didn't know what to do. "Last year, we had a violation and the kid came forward," Taylor said. "I mean, nobody even knew about it. The kid confessed, told the coach. He just took his punishment. My experience so far is that works. You know how Joplin is. You're going to find out sooner or later." Jim Simpson, R-8 superintendent, has said the district will not investigate reports of violations by students or parents, or consider hearsay allegations. Simpson said the district doesn't have the resources or the desire to investigate such allegations. Board members have said they will not use the policy as a way to go on "witch hunts." Evidence of a violation must include direct observation by a school staff member or legal action. Simpson said school officials also will not actively look for students violating the code. Students have the right to appeal any punishment under the policy. Also, when a punishment prevents students from participating in an activity for which they receive a grade, the policy calls for the teacher to make an alternative assignment. Currently in place for student athletes is a program of voluntary drug testing. If the test determines a student is using drugs, the school levies no punishment but calls the student's parents. Baugh said that gives her another tool for resisting peer pressure. Taylor said a group of students formed a committee to propose mandatory drug testing for athletes. Students have circulated petitions at the school, and they plan to present the proposal to school administrators or the school board sometime in the future. Firm ground Susan Hoffmeister, parent of a student athlete and president of the athletic booster club, said she is happy with the final form of the code as approved by the school board. She served on the committee that developed the policy. She said she hopes the policy will serve as a deterrent and help students make the right decisions. "It pretty much lays out in black and white what the punishment will be," Hoffmeister said. "Hopefully, enforcement will be real consistent. We're not going to be policing the students." Mark Taylor, whose son plays sports, also served on the committee. He said the group had the best interests of the students and the school district in mind when developing the code. He said he agrees with the changes made by the school board. He said no policy will ensure that all students will make right choices or prevent some students from making wrong choices. "It makes clear what's expected of them," Taylor said. Doug Doss, R-8 athletic director, said he's glad the policy gained school board approval after months of work by many people. "This gives us some firm ground to stand on," Doss said. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom