Pubdate: Tue, 11 Dec 2001
Source: Guelph Mercury (CN ON)
Copyright: 2001 Guelph Mercury Newspapers Limited
Contact:  http://www.guelphmercury.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1418

TAKING STRIP SEARCHES OUT OF THE ROUTINE

Last week's Supreme Court of Canada ruling outlawing the routine 
performance of strip searches by police and jail guards is welcome.

Not welcome by everyone, of course, but welcome by those who have been put 
through the unpleasant ordeal for no apparent reason other than to cruelly 
deprive them of their human dignity and spirit.

Strip searches -- in which people taken into custody are ordered to take 
off all their clothes and be thoroughly inspected for drugs, weapons or 
whatever else their jailers might choose to look for -- are sometimes 
needed. Where there is reason to suppose the detainee is concealing 
weapons, drugs or poisons, such careful searches are justified. They are 
needed. Idiots alone would disagree that police or jail officials should 
take stern pro-active measures to protect either themselves, other inmates 
or even the suspects themselves.

There are other instances, however, where strip searches make no protective 
sense whatever. Seven women who underwent such a search at the Wellington 
Detention Centre after they picked out of a crowd of political 
demonstrators in 1997, are a prominent, local case in point. They were 
arrested for breaching the peace, but they were never formally charged. 
There was never any reason to suspect they were armed or dangerous -- or 
were anything but decent citizens caught in the act of vociferously and 
legally protesting an unpopular and badly-flawed provincial government 
education bill. Only because they had been delivered to the detention 
centre (there was apparently no room for them at the police station) were 
they strip-searched. It was prison routine. Everybody who arrived there was 
given the same, shabby, punitive treatment. They were ordered to strip 
naked and to be searched.

Well, it won't be such a simple, mindless matter of routine any more. Jail 
staffs will have to use their brains. And that may be a problem because the 
Supreme Court ruling makes it clear that they could be headed for court 
themselves should their decision to perform a strip search on a objecting 
individual be seriously challenged.

The inevitable result is that there'll be far fewer strip searches 
performed. It may be that none will be performed unless prison officials 
first establish reasonable and probable grounds to justify their action.

Supreme Court ruling or no Supreme Court ruling, however, established 
punitive rituals are seldom completely killed off; they tend to 
transmogrify into other, compensatory rituals. In the case of the strip 
search, the likely replacement is what Waterloo Regional Police term the 
'thorough search' -- a routine that differs only slightly from its 
predecessor in that it requires the detainee to remove one article of 
clothing at a time. The article is then checked by an officer and returned 
before the next article of clothing is removed and inspected.

When applied routinely to every detainee regardless of the reasons for 
their detention, it is hard to view the 'thorough search' as a more humane 
or reasonable procedure than its older sister.

It is a legal dodge. Indeed, if the Supreme Court justices had been aware 
of its existence, it is quite possible the two would have been banned in 
the same curt judgment. Both clearly violate the right of citizens to be 
(in the words of the Supreme Court) "secure from unreasonable search and 
seizure".

Summary - The Supreme Court has moved to have strip searches performed only 
where they are warranted.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Keith Brilhart