Pubdate: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 Source: Ft. Worth Star-Telegram (TX) Copyright: 2001 Star-Telegram, Fort Worth, Texas Contact: 400 W. Seventh Street, Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Website: http://www.star-telegram.com/ Forum: http://www.star-telegram.com/comm/forums/ Author: Karen Brooks FUNDS SOUGHT FOR ANALYZING OD REPORTS AUSTIN -- The state's poison-control network is asking for $1 million for a statewide computer system and a full-time epidemiologist to analyze reports of illegal drug overdoses from Texas health care facilities. Prompted by a spate of heroin-related deaths in North Texas in the late 1990s, legislation passed in 1999 requires hospitals and clinics to report overdoses to one of the six regional poison centers. But lawmakers didn't provide any money for record keeping. With no reliable way to process the information -- track trends, offer real-time numbers and follow up with hospitals to verify numbers -- its usefulness is limited, public health officials said. "We're going to be reporting regardless, but it's the difference between driving a new car and driving a beat-up Camaro," said toxicologist Greene Shepherd, acting director of the North Texas Poison Center in Dallas. And if the numbers don't prove useful, it's difficult to get full participation from hospitals -- rendering the statistics incomplete, said Dennis Perrotta, an epidemiologist at the Texas Department of Health in Austin and the agency's poison-control network liaison. The epidemiologist would work at the Texas Department of Health, interpreting the numbers and ferreting out the meaning behind the statistics, Perrotta said. "We want somebody like this to enable us to analyze this information, because collecting information and doing nothing with it is a waste of time," he said. The computer network, which would cost $950,000, would be valuable for real-time reporting of statistics -- avoiding a months-long lag time, said Bill Watson, managing director and clinical professor at the South Texas Poison Center and one of the officials overseeing the law's implementation. The statewide numbers for 2000 arrived in Watson's office in late January. He'll use the statistics to gauge the law's effectiveness and develop a baseline for tracking trends. Even in the early stages, the statistics strengthen the overall picture of drug use and abuse in Texas, researchers say. Jane Maxwell of the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse said information from hospitals and clinics in conjunction with her research bolster the big picture. "I find it a wonderful data source, and I'm using it more and more in my work," Maxwell said. The goal is to start issuing regular reports on the data within the next year, after poison-control officials tie up logistical loose ends: who would get the data and what kind of number-crunching is involved, Shepherd said. Hospital participation is key. A year ago, about 15 percent of Texas' hospitals and clinics reported overdoses; now, that's increased to between 50 percent and 60 percent. Hospitals that don't comply can be fined, but that usually isn't enforced - -- similar to laws governing mandatory reporting of other illnesses to state health authorities, Shepherd said. Hospitals faced some of the earliest challenges in implementing the law. They had to determine how to define an overdose and then how to efficiently report it without taking valuable personnel time away from the emergency room -- where most overdose cases come in, hospital officials said. For each case, the report must include the date of the incident, the age and gender of the patient, the drug, symptoms and treatment. "We found that the requirement was going to be extremely tedious until we came up with a mechanism of faxing the information to poison control," said Grace Croft, director of emergency services at Harris Methodist HEB. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Stevens