Pubdate: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 Source: Albany Times Union (NY) Copyright: 2001 Capital Newspapers Division of The Hearst Corporation, Albany, Contact: News Plaza, Box 15000, Albany, NY 12212 Website: http://www.timesunion.com/ THE DAs ARE WRONG Their Pleas To Retain The State's Harsh Drug Laws Do Not Stand Up Under Scrutiny With the prospect of Rockefeller drug law reform more promising than ever, the state's district attorneys are pleading with Gov. Pataki to retain the status quo. But the governor should resist that plea. So should Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno, R-Brunswick, and Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, D-Manhattan. The prosecutors simply have not made a sound case for retaining these outdated and ineffective statues. That is nowhere more apparent than in the letter sent to Mr. Pataki by Schenectady County District Attorney Robert Carney, who is also president of the New York State District Attorneys Association, which represents all 62 county prosecutors in New York. "Violent crime is down dramatically in New York state,'' writes Mr. Carney, "and, in our view, one of the main reasons for the decline is the vigorous enforcement of our drug laws.'' But the decline in crime is part of a national pattern, and experts have attributed it to a variety of factors, including an aging population and lower unemployment. As for the impact of the Rockefeller drug laws, they have been on the books for nearly three decades. To hail them as effective now is to ignore their ineffectiveness for so long. They were designed to end drug crime by putting away kingpins for long prison terms. But no one would argue that the drug war is even close to being won in New York. To the contrary, the statistics show the Rockefeller statues to be dismal failures. New York's prison population in 1973, when the drug laws were enacted, was 13,000. Today, it is 70,000, and some 21,000 - -- or more than the entire prison population 28 years ago -- are serving time for drug offenses, often for lower-level offenses while the kingpins remain free. Meanwhile, other states have turned to alternative sentencing for drug offenses and are showing promising results in reducing crime and recidivism. The prosecutors like the Rockefeller laws because they give them leverage to force plea bargains from suspects, and to decide who should be remanded to treatment centers. But those decisions should be made in the courtroom, not a prosecutor's office. And judges should have more discretion in meting out sentences. The Rockefeller drug laws should not be used as a club to extract guilty pleas. Their only purpose should be to prescribe punishment that fits the crime. As of now, they do not. But that can change if state lawmakers and Gov. Pataki enact reforms that are long overdue. - --- MAP posted-by: Josh Sutcliffe