Pubdate: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 Source: Batesville Guard-Record (AR) Website: http://www.guardonline.com/ Address: PO Box 2036, Batesville, AR 72503 Feedback: http://www.guardonline.com/lettertoeditor.asp Forum: http://www.guardonline.com/hello.asp Copyright: 2001 Batesville Guard-Record Co. Inc. Author: Terrell Tebbetts Note: Terrell Tebbetts is the W.C. Brown professor of English at Lyon College. His column appears every other Friday in the Batesville Daily Guard. He may be reached at P.O. Box 2036, Batesville, AR 72503. NON-COVERAGE RAISES QUESTIONS Here and Now Did you know that there were three drug busts at Batesville High School and Junior High School a couple of weeks ago? By "drug busts" I mean three incidents in which students were caught with small amounts of illegal substances in their possession - such as pills and a marijuana cigarette. I know about the busts because I talked with one of the young men involved and then followed up with conversations with Dr. Merle Dickerson, Superintendent of Batesville Schools; Ron Lewallen, President of the Batesville School Board; Ronnie Coots, Principal of Batesville High School; John Hilburn, Chief Administrator of the Independence County Sheriff's Office; and Dan Johnson, Independence County Sheriff. Once I found out about these drug incidents, I had two big questions, maybe the same that you're having right now: I wondered why hadn't I read about them in the Guard. Was there some kind of cover-up going on? And, even more important, I wondered what kind of drug problem we have out there in our schools. If the growers and mixers and dealers had sucked in the kids just busted, how many more kids had they victimized? My daughter Nell is out there. Are our kids safe? After several days of phone calls and meetings, I'm glad to report that I'm reasonably satisfied with the answers to both questions. There does not seem to be any cover-up conspiracy at all. Certainly, the Guard would not be party to a cover-up. The school system and the sheriff's office don't seem to have been either. Here's why there's been no news coverage: According to Dickerson, the school is still in the process of dealing with the cases. The administration has set hearings to determine whether to follow the automatic 10-day suspensions with expulsions or with mandatory counseling, either of which is allowed by school policy. Dickerson says the schools themselves do not release news of such incidents because of their desire to protect the privacy of the minors involved and to help the kids' families help them recover. He adds, however, that Alan Cockrill, the deputy stationed on campus as safety resource officer, was centrally involved from the beginning and that the schools have authority to limit the normal reporting of the incidents to the sheriff's office, at which time they become open to the public and to the media for reporting. In fact, Dickerson says that "it is not in the interest of the school district to stonewall" on drug issues. "We want the kids to have the word," he says - the kids and their families too. The dealers are out there, there is a danger, be alert. So why have we not heard about the incidents through the normal channel of police reporting? Apparently, for a sad but not surprising reason. It was handled the way such cases are usually handled. Follow this: first, Johnson says that, in every incident encountered by officers in the field, the officer decides at his own discretion whether to make an arrest and file a written report. Okay, that part sounds fine. But then comes the sad part. According to Hilburn, our sheriff's deputies deal with cases of minor possession so frequently all over the county that ordinarily they do not make arrests or write reports, electing instead to refer minors to their parents. Hilburn adds that, if deputies arrested all individuals they found in minor possession, they'd overflow our jails and overwhelm our courts. Add to that the school's need to use its discretion. According to Coots, he and Assistant Principal David Campbell and Cockrill have to decide in each case whether the kids are more in need of help from their family or from the judicial system. Sometimes they have to "plea bargain" with the kids they've found with drugs in order to identify others. There's no reason in this to criticize the sheriff's office or the schools. In both cases, officials are exercising their judgment and making the best decisions they can to promote the good of the kids, and it's certainly true that a good family can do a lot more for a kid than jail time. The sad thing is that drugs are so ubiquitous. Those of us outside the drug culture have no idea how widespread the problem is. Which brings me back to my second big question. Are our kids safe out at the junior high and high school? I'm glad to say that the answer is yes - if they're not perfectly safe (who is?), they're at least safer there than anywhere else they might go. The school board and the administration are doing all they can to keep drugs off campus and ultimately out of the lives of our kids. In fact, the busts themselves are signs that new safety provisions are working. According to Lewallen, "the safety of the students" is a chief concern of the school board. Thus the stationing of Cockrill on campus since the beginning of this semester. His role was central in uncovering the drug cases and dealing with them. With no safety resource officer, the problem may well have gone undetected. Dickerson repeats Lewallen's assurance and adds more details. This summer, for example, the district will complete the installation of intercom and camera surveillance systems in the junior high and high schools. In addition, the school board is considering closing the high school campus for safety reasons - to eliminate both traffic dangers and off-campus access to drugs over the lunch hour. Coots says that a few days before the busts, one of the kids involved had returned to campus after lunch smelling of marijuana and had been called into the office for a strict warning. As another possibility, the board is also considering a drug testing program. It might, for example, require those driving to campus to agree to submit to random testing, which could involve from 5-15 percent of the student body each month. With this kind of attention to safety, the kids are better off than anywhere else they might be. I don't suppose many safety officers and principals keep watch in our stores and parks and movie houses and ball fields - or out on our back roads. And it is those kids and their lives we care about. I've long known the young man who spoke to me about his involvement. I've liked him as long as I've known him - liked his friendliness, his openness, his creativity. It makes me sick that the evil ones - the growers and mixers and sellers - have gotten to him and to the other young men, as well. I've long known his folks too - rock solid straight arrows both, the kind of people that we all want for friends and neighbors and fellow citizens. My heart goes out to them and indeed all the families as they deal with trying to rescue their sons from the evil ones and repair the damage those predators have done. The campus drug busts put us all on notice. The evil ones are at work, and our kids are in danger. I'm glad our Batesville School District and Independence County Sheriff's Office are fighting them. The good guys gotta win this one. - --- MAP posted-by: Josh Sutcliffe